I Symmetry transformation in Heisenberg vs Schrödinger Picture

hgandh
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Symmetry transformations are changes in our point of view that preserve the possible outcomes of experiment:
$$\Psi \rightarrow U(\Lambda) \Psi$$
In the Heisenberg picture, observables in a fixed reference frame evolve according to:
$$P(t) = U^\dagger (t)PU(t)$$ while in the Schrodinger picture, the state vector evolves as $$\Psi (t) = U(t) \Psi$$
Now at a time t, we change our reference frame. The expectation value of the observable in the two pictures is then
$$(U(\Lambda) \Psi, P(t)U(\Lambda) \Psi) $$ in the Heisenberg picture and $$(U(\Lambda) \Psi (t), PU(\Lambda) \Psi (t)) $$ in the Schrodinger picture. However, these do not give equivalent values. Can someone point out where my reasoning is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your symmetry transformation time-independent? I'm guessing it probably is and, if so, then ##U(\Lambda)## commutes with ##U(t)##, leading to equivalent expectation values, afaics.

HTH.
 
strangerep said:
Is your symmetry transformation time-independent? I'm guessing it probably is and, if so, then ##U(\Lambda)## commutes with ##U(t)##, leading to equivalent expectation values, afaics.

HTH.
No it is a general Lorentz transformation. I believe my mistake was the the time evolution operator itself changes in the new reference frame since the Hamiltonian as seen in this new frame is in general not the same as in the original.
$$U(t) \to U(\Lambda)U(t)U^{-1} (\Lambda)$$
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top