System of two spin 1/2 particles in an external magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the matrix elements for a system of two spin 1/2 particles in an external magnetic field requires using Pauli spinors and matrices. It's essential to adopt a consistent basis, specifically the eigenstates |m1 m2⟩ of the spin operator S_z, as indicated in the problem. The Hamiltonian H1 should be expressed as a matrix in this chosen basis rather than switching to spin states related to S_x. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining the selected basis throughout the calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the corresponding states.
ConorDMK
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
To save typing, I copied an image of the question and of my attempt at a solution. And the part I am having trouble with is part (iii).
Relevant Equations
Pauli spinors and matrices for x.
1620583282775.png


So what I'm not sure on, is calculating the matrix elements for part (iii) with Pauli spinors and Pauli matrices, and then finding the form of the corresponding states. As I don't see how using the hint helps.

1620585307763.png


The following is using the eigenvalues of the spin-operators.

1620584016635.png


1620591350235.png


Provided what I have is correct, I'm not sure on how to get to the form of the states.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you have adopted a basis, you must stick with it. The problem tells you that you have to use a basis ##|m_1 m_2 \rangle##, which are eigenstates of ##\hat{S}_z## for the respective particles. You must then express ##\hat{H}_1## as a matrix in the same basis, not using spin up/down with respect to ##\hat{S}_x##, as you are doing after.
 
DrClaude said:
Once you have adopted a basis, you must stick with it. The problem tells you that you have to use a basis ##|m_1 m_2 \rangle##, which are eigenstates of ##\hat{S}_z## for the respective particles. You must then express ##\hat{H}_1## as a matrix in the same basis, not using spin up/down with respect to ##\hat{S}_x##, as you are doing after.
Oh yeah, of course, thank you! It's been a while since I've done this stuff.
So I use,
1620657917972.png

which makes sense as to why the hint says to use Pauli Matrices and Spinors.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top