Systems held together by gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wuratch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Systems
AI Thread Summary
In systems held together by gravity, adding energy results in an increase in potential energy and a decrease in kinetic energy, as these systems exhibit negative heat capacity. When energy is added, particles move farther apart, leading to a reduction in their speed, as illustrated by the earth-moon system where the moon's higher orbit corresponds to a slower velocity. The relationship between total energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy is defined by the equation U = -2T, indicating that an increase in total energy leads to a decrease in kinetic energy. This counterintuitive behavior is explained through the dynamics of virial equilibrium, where an increase in energy causes potential energy to become less negative while kinetic energy decreases. Overall, the discussion clarifies the complex interplay between energy forms in gravitational systems.
Wuratch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For any system of particles held together by mutual attraction
U(potential) = -2 U(Kinetic)

Suppose you add energy to such a system and wait for it to equilibrate, does the total kinetic energy increase or decrease? Explain

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Apparently the kinetic energy decreases. How can you explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?
 
Dick said:
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?

It would increase and that's what I thought. But the book says that it is a system with a negative heat capacity. It's entropy vs. energy graph is concave-up. When you add energy, all the energy apparently goes into the potential energy and the particles in the system get farther apart and actually slow down. I don't fully understand this and don't know how to to give the explanation without just repeating what the book says
 
Actually the moon moving to a higher orbit means that it must slow down...

Note: mv^2/r=GMm/r^2 (M is mass of Earth, m is mass of moon)=> v=sqrt(GM/r) so that as r increases, v decreases.

Increasing the energy of a system in virial equilibrium goes like this:

E increases, so that T+U increases, but U=-2T, so that T-2T=-T increases. An increase in "negative T" means that T decreases and U increases. By U increases, we mean U becomes less negative.

For example, if E=-2J, T=2J, U=-4J, and I add 1J to this system, E now has to be -1J, and now I have a system of equations:

-1J=T+U, and U=-2T. Solving: -1J=T-2T=-T => T=1J, U=-2J. So you notice that U got less negative (went up) and T went down.
 
Hey, I tried to do this in this way:

I use V for potential energy and T for kinetic energy.

Given equation reads:

V=-2T

V+T=-T

Now you see that the left hand site is a total energy:

E_{tot}=-T

Differentiate the whole thing:

dE_{tot}=-dT

So if the total energy is increasing then dE_{tot}>0 and thus dT<0. This means that the kinetic energy is decreasing.
 
Thanks everyone. I realize my mistake was trying to explain it with just words
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top