Taylor expansion for matrix logarithm

Backpacker
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A paper I'm reading states the that: for positive hermitian matrices A and B, the Taylor expansion of \log(A+tB) at t=0 is

\log(A+tB)=\log(A) + t\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{B+zI}A \frac{1}{B+zI} dz + \mathcal{O}(t^2).

However, there is no source or proof given, and I cannot seem to find a derivation of this identity anywhere! Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Backpacker said:
A paper I'm reading states the that: for positive hermitian matrices A and B, the Taylor expansion of \log(A+tB) at t=0 is

\log(A+tB)=\log(A) + t\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{B+zI}A \frac{1}{B+zI} dz + \mathcal{O}(t^2).

However, there is no source or proof given, and I cannot seem to find a derivation of this identity anywhere! Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Welcome to PF, Backpacker! :smile:

I don't recognize your formula, but:

$$\log(A+tB)=\log(A(I+tA^{-1}B)= \log A + \log(I+tA^{-1}B) = \log A + tA^{-1}B + \mathcal{O}(t^2)$$
 
I like Serena said:
$$\log(A(I+tA^{-1}B)= \log A + \log(I+tA^{-1}B) $$
This doesn't seem quite right, unless ## A ## and ## B ## commute.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top