That's Not a Drone!

  • #1
russ_watters
Mentor
23,529
10,884
[Mod note: This thread was originally posted in the moderator's forum, but has been moved to the main forum due to its potential value for the community. It started mainly humorous, but we've added serious content to make this a teachable moment.]

As I think most of you probably know New Jersey is having a drone/UFO mass hysteria event right now. Well, I was driving home from work tonight and the traffic report comes up on the radio. They reported a drone over a highway I drive frequently that passes a couple of miles from my house. Why that's relevant to traffic I'm not sure, but anyway I just shook my head and checked flightradar24. No helicopters at least. I get home, unload some groceries, and look out my garage, to the southeast towards that highway and I think I see it! It's not a drone, it's...

Venus! It's frickin Venus! There's a straight section of that highway maybe 5 miles away that runs southwest in the evening-commute direction. Lots of time to stare at Venus and wonder if it's moving.

I don't know why, but this thing annoys me more than it probably should, with all these pictures and videos of obvious airplanes in the news, and the newscasters just nodding their heads and saying "drone" over and over. That's not a drone!!

Ugh.

[Late edit prior to moving to GD]
FBI statement on the investigation:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/15/us/drone-sightings-east-coast/index.html

Of 5,000 sightings reported to the FBI (as of Monday Dec 16) "less than 100" have "deemed worthy of further investigative activity" and of those none have yet proved "nefarious".

Drones exist and they sometimes cause problems or are even used in spying or other nefarious activities. It's possible this all started with a real sighting or several. But to within a pretty good measurement precision (<2%) all of the subsequent reported sightings are mis-identified mundane things. Note though: in this event, the word "drone" may have partially replaced "UFO" or "UAV" so I wouldn't necessarily say that's 5,000 claimed "drone" sightings but rather would call most 'I can't identify it so it might be a drone'.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Klystron, AlexB23, berkeman and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How far are these sightings from Grovers Mill?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Redbelly98, diogenesNY, jim mcnamara and 1 other person
  • #4
Nugatory said:
How far are these sightings from Grovers Mill?
Maybe it's Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems testing new models...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Klystron, diogenesNY and DaveC426913
  • #5
You only saw the planet Venus : r/XFiles
 
  • Like
Likes diogenesNY
  • #6
russ_watters said:
All over it
Hmmm.... so maybe 1938 wasn't a hoax? They've been hiding underground like cicadas and now are hatching out?

The silliness has infected my local (North Carolina, USA) social media with random sightings prompting "watch the sky - this is related to what's happening in New Jersey" posts. Mostly aircraft of course, but the geminids may be contributing.
 
  • #7
russ_watters said:
All over it:
I'm in Monmouth County. Help me! :oldsurprised:
 
  • Care
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc and russ_watters
  • #8
Apparently Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determined that most sitings were of routine air traffic, both public and private. Some were saying that the drones were the size of vehicles, such as cars or buses. That would indeed be a large drone (UAV).
 
  • Like
Likes Flyboy
  • #9
People are so bad at identifying what they see, especially if they never look up.

When I was doing my Ph.D., I would travel by train daily between Paris and Orsay, going by the Orly airport. I remember countless times where I would see a big passenger plane seeming to hover in the air, an illusion due to its relative motion with respect to the trail and the absence of visual clues near the airplane.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, jtbell and russ_watters
  • #10
There is a concerning progression of crowd hysterics amplified by social media.
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, Flyboy, jedishrfu and 3 others
  • #11
New Jersey rocker Steven Van Zandt says all drones should be illegal: 'It could be a bomb'
https://www.yahoo.com/news/legendary-nj-musician-says-drones-185257321.html

“I only have one question — why are drones legal?” asked Van Zandt Dec. 13 on MSNBC's “The 11th Hour” news talk show. “Are they not a terrorist act waiting to happen? I mean, it's a miracle there hasn't been a terrorist act done by drones.”

Many residents across New Jersey have spotted drones, some as big as cars, of an unknown origin. Law enforcement members and U.S. Coast Guard personnel have reported sightings. Federal officials have said there is no threat to national security.

But why trust "the government" or national security "experts".

Meanwhile,
Drones are legal to fly in most locations, but there are some stipulations, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.

Fliers must take a basic safety knowledge test, fly below 400 feet, fly away from airports, avoid all other aircraft, keep the drone in sight, and don't cause a hazard to people or property.
 
  • #12
This seems reasonable:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn, berkeman and Greg Bernhardt
  • #13
Astronuc said:
But why trust "the government" or national security "experts".
I just watched the 3 Mile Island doc on Netflix. I can see why some are skeptical about trusting certain sources.
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23 and russ_watters
  • #15
Astronuc said:
Some were saying that the drones were the size of vehicles, such as cars or buses.
It's kind of hard to judge an object's size when you don't know how far away it actually is, especially at night.
 
  • #16
“I only have one question — why are drones legal?” asked Van Zandt Dec. 13 on MSNBC's “The 11th Hour” news talk show. “Are they not a terrorist act waiting to happen? I mean, it's a miracle there hasn't been a terrorist act done by drones.”

Guns. What about guns?
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and D H
  • #17
1734542155620.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Klystron, phinds and 8 others
  • #18
1734560670495.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes phinds, AlexB23, pinball1970 and 3 others
  • #19
2ADCF2RKIBF4ZLYDNAT5DT2LKM.jpg
 
  • Haha
Likes davenn, Astronuc, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #20
Greg Bernhardt said:
I just watched the 3 Mile Island doc on Netflix. I can see why some are skeptical about trusting certain sources.
My opinions on that documentary aside, this particular incident has included a rash of exceptionally poor responses from public officials. People should remember that a local mayor or even a Senator or President Elect is not necessarily any better at identifying things in the night sky than the average American. But note, there is one group that rarely sees UFOs even though they should see the most: astronomers.

Mod note: No politics here. The problem I described above is not a partisan issue, it is universal amongst people, not just politicians.
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23 and Astronuc
  • #21
jtbell said:
It's kind of hard to judge an object's size when you don't know how far away it actually is, especially at night.
Impossible to judge. For an individual point source light the distance could be almost literally anything. Venus reported as a drone is at least seven orders of magnitude off in estimated distance. Even for airplanes, today most airliners look almost exactly the same regardless of size. An A350 and a 737 look exactly the same to an untrained eye so a big plane at 10,000 ft looks the same as a smaller plane at 5,000 ft.....and that's during the day. At night if it's just a collection of lights, an A350 can look similar to a Learjet.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
The newscasters are just nodding their heads and "droning" on.

Venus does look good at the moment, in the evening.

Humans have survived to this day because they are sufficiently paranoid to avoid most threats. I claim that about 5% of the population are too paranoid for their own good, and that about 2% are so fearful that they do not leave their house, (so we don't see them). It is not surprising that, 5% - 2% = 3%, of people fear the unknown, and will report it to their social media, or to the authorities. That is just a part of the human condition.

So, what if there are drones flying about? Why does any sane person care? The operators are wasting their time flying, and recharging the batteries. You should avoid fascination, and get on with your real life.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #23
russ_watters said:
People should remember that a local mayor or even a Senator or President Elect is not necessarily any better at identifying things in the night sky than the average American.
I would expect a politician to do more research before posting on social media, but maybe my expectations are too high here.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, AlexB23, Flyboy and 1 other person
  • #24
mfb said:
I would expect a politician to do more research before posting on social media, but maybe my expectations are too high here.
Yes, you'd hope. I'm not sure if you've seen any of the videos but a few local politicians have posted videos of them driving around looking for "drones" and they are about as bad as anything you've seen elsewhere:
https://nypost.com/2024/12/14/us-ne...h-police-with-rash-of-sightings-across-state/

No flighradard24, no binoculars, no long lens camera, nothing that would imply a serious effort or critical/non-conspiratorial mind at work. Everything they saw in the sky that they couldn't identify was a "drone".

And that one's not even as bad as the offshore Iranian mothership submarine (no, I didn't make that up).
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...sightings-new-jersey-pentagon-says-rcna183863
 
  • #26
Somewhat topical…
IMG_3770.jpeg


I think most people don’t even bother looking up at night anymore, but now that there’s a supposed reason to, nothing is familiar to them and they just assume it’s the purported threat.

I know I was guilty of that many years ago. I saw an odd, slowly moving orange light climbing into the sky an initially thought it was a fighter jet in afterburner climbing away from me. After it was still present a solid minute later, I figured it had to be something else, and when another one joined it about 30 seconds after I realized it wasn’t what I thought…

I realized it was those floating hot air balloon lantern things.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, russ_watters and AlexB23
  • #27
Flyboy said:
Somewhat topical…
View attachment 354655

I think most people don’t even bother looking up at night anymore, but now that there’s a supposed reason to, nothing is familiar to them and they just assume it’s the purported threat.

I know I was guilty of that many years ago. I saw an odd, slowly moving orange light climbing into the sky an initially thought it was a fighter jet in afterburner climbing away from me. After it was still present a solid minute later, I figured it had to be something else, and when another one joined it about 30 seconds after I realized it wasn’t what I thought…

I realized it was those floating hot air balloon lantern things.
There are "drone like sightings" (w standard FAA lighting) and "bright orb" sightings - many videos circulating now. A theory of why we see a mix is because our drones are looking for the orbs. If we are all being conned, it's a heck of a show.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, mfb and Tom.G
  • #29
This one is really disappointing:


It's a news crew with a professional TV camera on a tripod, likely looking at Venus. They admit they have no idea what they are looking at, but worse, they also have no idea how to get a quality picture/video of the night sky with a $10,000 (guess) camera that is certainly capable of resolving Venus.

I'm going to need to take a video to demonstrate this, but I'll have to wait a few days for clearer skies.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, mfb, AlexB23 and 1 other person
  • #30
Have you ever mistaken a worker for a drone? Or a queen for a drone?
 
  • #31
If I were a bad guy flying a drone at night for some nefarious purpose, would I turn its lights on? :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #32
jtbell said:
If I were a bad guy flying a drone at night for some nefarious purpose, would I turn its lights on? :wink:
Yes. To camouflage it as Venus. :p
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes mfb, jtbell, BillTre and 2 others
  • #33
"This is not an exercise".
That might be a drone.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #34
russ_watters said:
It's a news crew with a professional TV camera on a tripod, likely looking at Venus. They admit they have no idea what they are looking at, but worse, they also have no idea how to get a quality picture/video of the night sky with a $10,000 (guess) camera that is certainly capable of resolving Venus.

I'm going to need to take a video to demonstrate this, but I'll have to wait a few days for clearer skies.
Please send ABC a link to your video when done.
They really need to now when they are being stupid, on national TV, to millions of people.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
  • #35
Bandersnatch said:
Yes. To camouflage it as Venus. :p
Hmmm... I took this picture earlier this month, a few miles from the Kings Bay submarine base in Georgia. :wideeyed:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top