The angular momentum operator acting on a wave function

Jerrynap
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I need help on interpreting this solution.

Let me have two wave functions:
\phi_1 = N_1(r) (x+iy)
\phi_2 = N_2(r) (x-iy)

If the angular momentum acts on both of them, the result will be:

L_z \phi_1 = \hbar \phi_1
L_z \phi_2 = -\hbar \phi_2

My concern is, \phi_1 and \phi_2 look really like the complex conjugate of each other, so why do they have different eigenvalue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jerrynap said:
My concern is, \phi_1 and \phi_2 look really like the complex conjugate of each other, so why do they have different eigenvalue?
Why should they have the same eigenvalue? Have a look at the complex conjugated eigenvalue equation (A|λ>)* = (λ|λ>)* <=> A*|λ>*=λ|λ>*.
 
kith said:
Why should they have the same eigenvalue? Have a look at the complex conjugated eigenvalue equation (A|λ>)* = (λ|λ>)* <=> A*|λ>*=λ|λ>*.

Well, A* = A (hermitian) and λ is real. So wouldn't it be

<br /> \hat{A}^*\left| λ\right\rangle^* = \hat{A}\left| λ\right\rangle^* = λ\left| λ\right\rangle^* ?<br />
 
Jerrynap said:
Well, A* = A (hermitian)
Hermitian refers to the adjoint operator A+ and not to the complex conjugate A*. If you look at Lz in spherical coordinates, you see that it isn't invariant under complex conjugation because it contains an "i".
 
Oh... I see where the negative sign came about. Lz* = -Lz. This can be seen in Cartesian coordinates as well since p* = -p. Thanks kith
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top