B The average value of S operator

Viona
Messages
49
Reaction score
12
TL;DR Summary
Why the average value of S operator is considered to be the projection of S onto J ?
While reading in the book of Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David Griffith in the section of Fine structure of Hydrogen: spin- orbit coupling, he said that the average value of S operator is considered to be the projection of S onto J. I could not understand why he assumed that. please help me to understand.
Untitled.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given the fine-structure Hamiltonian ##H = A\vec{L} \cdot \vec{S}##, try to calculate the commutator ##[H,\vec{S}]##. What do you get, in vector form?
 
What I was getting at is that if you do the algebra, I get $$[H,\vec{S}] = iA\vec{S} \times \vec{L} = iA\vec{S} \times \vec{J}$$ where the last step is true because ##\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{S}##. Use the Ehrenfest theorem on this to get $$\frac{d\langle \vec{S} \rangle}{dt} = \frac{A}{\hbar} \langle \vec{S} \times \vec{J} \rangle $$

##\vec{S}## can be split into two components: ##S_{||}## which is parallel to ##\vec{J}## and ##\vec{S}_{\perp}## which is perpendicular to ##\vec{J}##. Since the cross product cancels the parallel part, only the perpendicular part has time dependence (it precesses). The equation for ##\langle \vec{S}_{\perp} \rangle## is the equation for a spinning top (precession). The time averaged value of ##\vec{S}_{\perp}## is zero.
 
Thank you all for useful replies.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top