The Blind Door Experiment and Statistics

In summary, the conversation discusses a thought experiment about three doors, where two have junk behind them and one has a grand prize. After initially choosing a door, the host opens one of the other wrong doors and gives the option to switch. The conversation debates the odds of switching and whether it increases the chances of winning. The conclusion is that switching does increase the chances, as there is a 2/3 probability of choosing the wrong door initially. The conversation also mentions a similar scenario with 100 doors to further explain the concept.
  • #1
Lyuokdea
154
0
Ok, so my statistics teacher talked to our class about this as a thought experiment, there are three doors, behind two of the doors are junk, the other door has some grand prize behind it, for the sake of simplification, let's say the prize is behind door two.

So you pick a door, you have a 1/3 chance of picking the correct door. Now they open one of the other wrong doors (if you picked a wrong door, they show you the other one, if you picked the right door they could show you either wrong one) and then give you the chance to repick, Now, there are two doors and one is right, so your chances would appear to be 50%, but if you picked that door out of three, they really are still 33%. Now you are given the chance to pick the other door if you want to, upon making a choice of weather to switch or not, it would appear that your odds are now 50%, yet how did the odds suddenly change if you decide to stay with the door you were originally on?

Also, my teacher says that if do choose the other door, you will be correct 2/3 of the time, how is this true? Since you are picking again from two, it would seem that you only have a 50% chance of choosing the right door. Can anybody prove that it would be 66% of the time mathematically?

Thanks for your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ok, well, 5 seconds after I posted this it clicked, actually it clicked right after I walked down to play madden 2004, maybe I should try playing that game more often, is this the correct reason?

When you are choosing either door, you are actually choosing the other two doors, the chances at the beginning are 2/3 that you will chose the wrong door, and thus whenever you do that, the other wrong door will be shown and the other door closed must be the right one, so according to those statistics, the other door will be right 2/3 of the time. For instance if it is door 2, and you choose 3, then three will be revealed, you switch to 2 and are correct, and if you choose 3, then 1 will be revealed and you will be right if you switch again, and if you pick to and then switch, you will be wrong, so you are right 2/3 of the time and only wrong 1/3.
 
  • #3
Yes your right, the imporant thing to remeber is that the right door will not be closed if you don't pick it.

One easier way to understand it is to imagine the same situation, but with 100 doors (i.e. you pick one out of 100 doors, and 98 out of the 99 doors you didn't pick are closed).
 
  • #4
I believe the "consider the case of 100 doors and the m.c. opens 99 of them" was Marilyn VosSavant's suggestion. I first saw the "Monty Hall" problem (he was m.c. of let's make a deal many years ago) as an exercise in chapter 1 of a prob and stats book.
 

FAQ: The Blind Door Experiment and Statistics

What is the Blind Door Experiment?

The Blind Door Experiment is a statistical test used to determine if a person is able to accurately identify a door by using their sense of touch. This experiment is often used in research studies to test the effectiveness of various forms of sensory perception.

How does the Blind Door Experiment work?

In the Blind Door Experiment, a participant is blindfolded and asked to identify a door by feeling its surface. The participant is then given a list of possible answers and must choose the correct door. The results are then analyzed statistically to determine if the participant's choices were based on chance or actual sensory perception.

Why is the Blind Door Experiment important in statistics?

The Blind Door Experiment is important in statistics because it allows researchers to test the validity of sensory perception and determine if there is a significant difference between chance and actual perception. This can help in understanding how humans process sensory information and can also have practical applications in fields such as psychology and medicine.

What are the limitations of the Blind Door Experiment?

One limitation of the Blind Door Experiment is that it relies on participants' ability to accurately identify a door by touch, which may vary depending on factors such as age, gender, or previous experience. Additionally, the results of the experiment may be affected by the design of the doors and the list of possible answers given to the participant.

How can the Blind Door Experiment be improved?

The Blind Door Experiment can be improved by using a larger sample size, ensuring that the doors and possible answers are randomized, and controlling for any potential biases or confounding variables. Additionally, using more advanced statistical analyses can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results and their significance.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
212
Views
13K
Replies
32
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top