I The direction of three forces acting on a line has to be concurrent?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Ko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Forces
AI Thread Summary
In a system in equilibrium, if the third line of action does not intersect the crossing point of two force lines, a net torque is created, which contradicts the conditions for equilibrium. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the proof provided in the textbook regarding this concept. Participants acknowledge a lack of initial comprehension but express agreement with the established principles. The exchange emphasizes the necessity of careful reading and comprehension in physics discussions. Understanding these fundamental concepts is crucial for grasping equilibrium conditions.
Jason Ko
Messages
21
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
I found this theorem in D. Morin's book on mechanics. How to prove it mathematically? Does it have a name?
1709042028580.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the point of crossing of two of the force lines of action. If the third line of action does not pass through that crossing, there is a net torque and therefore this cannot happen for a system in equilibrium.
 
Thanks! I was being stupid
 
Jason Ko said:
Thanks! I was being stupid
Probably you didn't read the "simple" proof provided below the statement that you highlighted in the textbook.
 
kuruman said:
Probably you didn't read the "simple" proof provided below the statement that you highlighted in the textbook.
Nor I. Good thing I agree with Morin though … 😛
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top