The Eigenfunction of a 2-electron system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the wave function of a two-electron system is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian when the electrons do not interact. The user is struggling with the calculations, particularly in substituting the two-electron wave function into the Hamiltonian and confirming that the energy is constant and independent of the radial coordinate. Despite knowing that Z = 2, the user is unable to derive the expected energy value, indicating a potential misstep in factoring out the kinetic energy term. A suggestion from another participant ultimately helps the user resolve the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the Hamiltonian to multi-electron systems in quantum mechanics.
Settho
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Show that the wave function is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian.
Relevant Equations
Hamiltonian, wave function, energy and Born radius
Hello!

I am stuck at the following question:
Show that the wave function is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian if the two electrons do not interact, where the Hamiltonian is given as;
Schermafbeelding 2019-04-28 om 20.33.57.png


the wave function and given as;
Schermafbeelding 2019-04-28 om 20.34.45.png


and the energy and Born radius are given as:
Schermafbeelding 2019-04-28 om 20.51.31.png


and I used this for ∇ squared:
Schermafbeelding 2019-04-28 om 20.50.07.png


I am stuck at the end of the calculation. I know Z = 2, but somehow I don't end up with the energy, which you need to show that it is indeed an eigenfunction. This is what I get and where I am stuck at:
Schermafbeelding 2019-04-28 om 20.46.42.png


and even when I substitute a0 in this formula, I don't get the energy value. I honestly don't know where it did go wrong.
If someone is able to help, that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to substitute the two-electron wavefunction$$\psi(r_1,r_2)=\psi(r_1)\psi(r_2)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\left( \frac{Z}{a_0}\right)^{3/2}e^{-\frac{Z}{a_0}r_1}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\left( \frac{Z}{a_0}\right)^{3/2}e^{-\frac{Z}{a_0}r_2}$$in your Hamiltonian. The energy is a constant and should have no ##r## dependence.
 
Last edited:
But isn't it just the idea to split the Hamiltonian in electron 1 and electron 2 instead of the two-electron wave function?
 
Settho said:
I am stuck at the end of the calculation. I know Z = 2, but somehow I don't end up with the energy, which you need to show that it is indeed an eigenfunction. This is what I get and where I am stuck at:
View attachment 242595
The ##-\hbar^2 / 2m## term doesn't factor out of all terms.
 
DrClaude said:
The ##-\hbar^2 / 2m## term doesn't factor out of all terms.

Your simple suggestion made me solve the problem. Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top