The Energy and Efficiency of Cross-Country Skiing: A Mathematical Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy and efficiency calculations involved in cross-country skiing, specifically when ascending a 300 m peak. The minimum mechanical work required for the ascent is calculated as 191,100 J, and kinetic energy is not considered since the skier's speed remains constant. The metabolic rate needed, given an efficiency of 11% over a 30-minute climb, is determined to be approximately 11.68 W. For the frictional energy dissipated over a distance of 1200 m, the calculation involves multiplying the friction force of 4.5 N by the distance, yielding a total work done by friction. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding energy efficiency in physical activities like skiing.
snav96
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
  1. A cross-country skier ascends a peak and rises 300 m vertically during the ascent. Her mass including clothing skis, poles, shoes and backpack is 65 kg.
    1. (a) Find the minimum mechanical work needed to be done by the skier (neglect friction).
    2. (b) Why do we not need to consider the skier’s kinetic energy in part (a)?
    3. (c) What is the metabolic rate needed, if the efficiency for this activity is 11% and it took 30 min to climb up that 300 m? (‘rate’ here means energy/time, i.e. power).
    4. (d) If the mean sliding friction force opposing motion of the skis when slid forward with each stride is 4.5 N, how much energy is dissipated by friction in a distance of 1200 m measured along the path?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Potential Energy = 300 m x 9.8 x 65 Kg = 191100 J

b) because the speed stays constant. there's no change in kinetic energy [/B]

c) amount of efficient energy = 191100 x 0.11 = 21021 J
Power = 21021 / 30 x 60 = 11.68 w

d) ?

can anyone check to see if my answers are correct? and help me with part d? cause i have no idea how to answer part d

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snav96 said:
A cross-country skier ascends a peak and rises 300 m vertically during the ascent. Her mass including clothing skis, poles, shoes and backpack is 65 kg.
  1. (a) Find the minimum mechanical work needed to be done by the skier (neglect friction).
  2. (b) Why do we not need to consider the skier’s kinetic energy in part (a)?
  3. (c) What is the metabolic rate needed, if the efficiency for this activity is 11% and it took 30 min to climb up that 300 m? (‘rate’ here means energy/time, i.e. power).
  4. (d) If the mean sliding friction force opposing motion of the skis when slid forward with each stride is 4.5 N, how much energy is dissipated by friction in a distance of 1200 m measured along the path?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[/b]

a) Potential Energy = 300 m x 9.8 x 65 Kg = 191100 J

b) because the speed stays constant. there's no change in kinetic energy

c) amount of efficient energy = 191100 x 0.11 = 21021 J
Power = 21021 / 30 x 60 = 11.68 w
Efficiency is (useful output)/input. The useful output in this problem is the work needed to ascend the 300 m.

d) ?

Can anyone check to see if my answers are correct, and help me with part d Because I have no idea how to answer part d?
Part d is asking you to calculate the work done by friction.
 
vela said:
Efficiency is (useful output)/input. The useful output in this problem is the work needed to ascend the 300 m.Part d is asking you to calculate the work done by friction.
so it is it just 4.5N x 1200m ?
 
Yup.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top