The flux through a cylinder from a charge at the origin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric flux through a cylinder with a charge located at the origin, using Gauss's law. The participants clarify the area elements for the top face and curved surface of the cylinder, emphasizing the need to consider the entire cylinder for applying Gauss's law. They derive expressions for the flux through the top dome and curved surface, noting the importance of integrating over specific angles and distances. The final results align with those obtained using Gauss's law, confirming the calculations for both the top and curved surfaces. The conversation highlights the integration process and the significance of directional components in determining the total flux.
hmparticle9
Messages
152
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
Consider a cylinder that has its origin at the centre. It has height 2 and radius 1. Let us place a charge ##q## at the origin. Compute the flux coming from the top and bottom faces. Compute the flux coming from the curved surface. First answer the two questions using Gauss's law then use direct computation.
Relevant Equations
Gauss's law:
$$\int_{S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \text{d}\mathbf{S} = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}$$
First the things I can figure out.

For the top face:
$$\text{d}\mathbf{S} = r \text{d} \theta \text{d} r \mathbf{e}_z$$
For the curved surface (remember that the radius is 1):
$$\text{d}\mathbf{S} = \text{d} \theta \text{d} z \mathbf{e}_r$$

I am not sure how to apply Gauss's law. Because the top face does not enclose the charge at the origin.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about inscribing the cylinder in a sphere. The rest should follow easilly.
 
hmparticle9 said:
For the top face:
$$\text{d}\mathbf{S} = r \text{d} \theta \text{d} r$$
For the curved surface (remember that the radius is 1):
$$\text{d}\mathbf{S} = \text{d} \theta \text{d} z$$
##d\mathbf{S}## is a vector quantity, so you need to include unit vectors to indicate the directions.

hmparticle9 said:
I am not sure how to apply Gauss's law. Because the top face does not enclose the charge at the origin.
Gauss's law applies only to the entire cylinder. You have to break the integral into a sum over the three pieces.
$$\oint \vec E \cdot d\vec S = \int_{\rm top face} \vec E \cdot d\vec S + \int_{\rm curved\ surface} \vec E \cdot d\vec S \int_{\rm bottom} \vec E \cdot d\vec S$$ For this problem, however, this isn't really going to help you. You want to think about @hutchphd's hint.
 
  • Like
Likes hmparticle9
Okay. I have figured out that we need a sphere with radius ##\sqrt{2}## for us to fit my cylinder snug.

Gauss's law says that the flux through the sphere is ##q/\epsilon_0##.

I think what we are interested in is the flux through the top dome as a ratio. Because the stuff coming through the top dome must have came through the head.

Yea sorry @vela it was a typo. fixed it now
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and vela
So the area of the dome is ##2 \pi \sqrt{2} (\sqrt{2} - 1)##, we can divide this by the total area of the sphere and we obtain:
$$\frac{q}{2\epsilon_0}\bigg(1- \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\bigg)$$
Obviously if we include the bottom as well we get the correct answer:
$$\frac{q}{\epsilon_0}\bigg(1- \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\bigg)$$

For the curved surface, it is clear from the above expression that the flux is
$$\frac{q}{\epsilon_0}\bigg(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\bigg)$$

Now I need to re-derive these expressions without using Gauss's law.
 
Last edited:
From looking at a diagram, the only component we need to worry about is the component of the flux in the ##z##-direction. The other directions get cancelled by flux passing through diametrically opposed points. I am going to deal with the top and bottom faces first. So here is what I think the answer should be.

$$F = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \times \frac{1}{1 + r^2} \times \frac{1}{(1 + r^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}} \times r \text{d}r \text{d}\theta$$

The first element in the above expression is boiler plate. The second term is the one over the squared distance to the patch we are considering. The third term is the fact we want to cosine component of the force. The last term comes from the fact that we are considering a little patch on the top of the cylinder. By integrating over ##\theta \in (0,2\pi)## and ##r \in (0,1)## we obtain the correct result.

For the curved surface:
$$F = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \times \frac{1}{1 + z^2} \times \frac{1}{(1 + z^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}} \times \text{d}z \text{d}\theta$$

integrating over ##z \in (-1,1)## and ##\theta \in (0,2\pi)## we obtain the result achieved using Gauss's rule above.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy, hutchphd, vela and 1 other person
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top