- #316
brainstorm
- 568
- 0
I think this is exactly the question that has to be dealt with regarding the role of US power globally. US authorities have to decide which regimes to legitimate or challenge and which insurgents to recognize as freedom fighters and which as terrorists interested only in replacing freedom with rule by fear. Also, what methods should be advocated and/or supported? Should the US support full scale revolutions or negotiations with more authoritarian governments that allow for freedom-seekers to migrate either to a US state or some other region where freedom and democracy are being expanded?Office_Shredder said:What specifically do you think the US government should do about that? Take over the UK so that the person's right to free speech is established?
It's not a question of legitimate authority but of power and goals. The British colonial authorities controlled the jurisdiction claimed by the US insurgents, but the insurgents decided to question that authority and declare independence from it. So the question is who has the power to declare independence from whom and how, imo.The constitution is generally a set of ideals that are intended to be applicable to everyone, but the US only has authority over the US, so that's where its boundaries are.
That is logical, since the constitution was established as a general ideology of governmental restraint against curtailment of rights and freedoms of individuals. However, the issue of how deportation and hence cooperation with less democratic governments fits with the constitutional ideology should be discussed, imo. For example, I read that several refugees from Cuba were recently picked up and returned to the island. I wonder how much sense it makes for US military authorities to be cooperating with a regime that is being embargoed. On the other hand, if the refugees best hope for freedom is to remain on the island and work toward freedom, perhaps that was the best place for them to have been brought. The bigger issue, however, is why policing national territories against migration has become more important than supporting the pursuit of freedom and democracy.On that note, if a non-citizen comes to the US, they still have all the protections under the constitution that a citizen would have, except for the possibility of deportation