The magnetic flux density at point P between parallel wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic flux density at point P between two parallel wires carrying currents of 15 A and 32 A in opposite directions, with a separation of 5.3 cm. The magnetic flux density contributions from each wire are calculated using the formula B = μ₀I/(2πr) and considering their directions with the right-hand rule. An initial calculation yielded a total magnetic flux density of approximately 0.17 mT, which was lower than the expected answer of 0.19 mT from the textbook. A conceptual error was identified in the method of vector addition, leading to a revised approach that correctly used the Pythagorean theorem to combine the flux densities, resulting in a total of approximately 0.19 mT. The final calculations confirm the expected result, highlighting the importance of vector addition in magnetic field problems.
whatdoido
Messages
48
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In the picture at points A and B are two thin parallel wires, where traveling currents are 15 A and 32 A to opposite directions. The distance between wires is 5.3 cm. Point's P distances from A and B are the same. Calculate the magnetic flux density at point P.
magndens1.png


Homework Equations


##B=\mu_0\frac{I}{2\pi r}##

The Attempt at a Solution



##I_1=15A##
##I_2=32A##
##x=5.3cm=0.053m##
##\mu_0=4\pi *10^-7 Tm/A##

I solved length L with Pythagorean equation

##L^2+L^2=x^2##

##L=\frac{x}{\sqrt{2}}##

With right-hand-rule the directions of magnetic flux density can be deduced. The magnetic flux density at point P generated from point B is to the direction of point A. From point A the generated magnetic flux density at point P is towards point B.

magndens2.png


To add both ##B_B## and ##B_A## they need to be turned downward by ##\theta## which is ##\theta=\frac{90^o}{2}=45^o##. This should be reasonable, right? The total magnetic flux density at point P is then:

##B_{total}=sin\theta B_B+sin\theta B_A=sin\theta\mu_0\frac{I_1}{2\pi \frac{x}{\sqrt{2}}}+sin\theta\mu_0\frac{I_2}{2\pi \frac{x}{\sqrt{2}}}=sin\theta(I_1+I_2)\frac{\mu_0}{\sqrt{2}\pi x}=1.773...*10^-4 T \approx 0.17mT##

This problem is from a book and it gives answer 0.19mT. I checked multiple times where I could have made a mistake but I cannot find it. The calculation is rather straightforward so there is not much to check. Thus it looks like there is some conceptual error? Thanks for reading and any help is appreciated
 

Attachments

  • magndens1.png
    magndens1.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,022
  • magndens2.png
    magndens2.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 859
Physics news on Phys.org
whatdoido said:
To add both ##B_B## and ##B_A## they need to be turned downward by θ
That will give you the PX component of each, but since they are of different magnitudes their resultant also has an AB component.
Since the two flux density vectors are orthogonal, it is much simpler to add them without resolving into PX and AB components.
 
Okay simply with Pythagorean style:

##B_{total}=\sqrt{B_B^2+B_A^2}=\sqrt{(\frac{μ_0 I_1}{√2πx})^2+(\frac{μ_0 I_2}{√2πx})^2}=1.886...*10^{-4} T \approx 0.19mT##

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top