- #71
Smurf
- 443
- 3
You know what. I'm going to change my answer to Gavrilo Princip. That guy's single action changed the entire century right from the beginning.
I think that the outcome from his actions are really much more contingent on the actions and reactions of others. To be fair it's probably best to measure a person's "influence" by the virtue of more direct effects of that person's existence and actions rather than a butterfly effect.Smurf said:You know what. I'm going to change my answer to Gavrilo Princip. That guy's single action changed the entire century right from the beginning.
You are suggesting that if Freud hadn't been around, none of these pople would have taken an interest in exploring the human mind? Or that others who are troubled would have had no one to go to?Smurf said:Except for... you know... the millions upon millions of people who either are psychotherapists or who's lives had been sufficiently altered by one.
ShawnD said:Mass killings are not as well remembered as you would like to think. Please read the following paragraph slowly. Read it twice if you need to.
The Japanese massacre of other Asian countries was just overwhelming. Upwards of 20 million people died. Japan is responsible for the largest mass rape in human history; over 700,000 women raped, 90% of them were killed afterwards (google for "jugun ianfu"). Japan's medical experiments on Chinese people dwarfed the ones done in the Nazi camps (google for "Shiro Ishii" or "unit 731"). People were dissected while they were still alive, without any kind of sedation. Japan was the only country in WW2 to use biological weapons on civilians; this included the bubonic plague, anthrax, and cholera. Japan was also the only country to use chemical weapons. Japan's PoW camps were much worse than Germany's camps. Germany's PoW camps had a death rate of less than 5%, whereas Japanese PoW camps had a death rate of 30% or higher.
In the end, which country was remembered more? Germany or Japan?
marlon said:and what about Thomas Edison ?
marlon
laminatedevildoll said:Maybe I will consider Edison instead of Spears.
No no, that's going to be Christina AguileraEL said:Well, it's a tight race I would say. But at least we can agree on Britney being the winner of the 21st century?
I'll buy that. Wilson did have a huge effect on US politics even after his death. (It could be argued that if it wasn't for Wilson then Roosevelt couldn't have gotten the US out of isolationism the second time)russ_watters said:I didn't see if anyone mentioned him already, but Wilson gets my vote. He is responsible for the UN, the Marshall plan, and the re-making of the geopolitical landscape of Europe in the 2nd half of the century. The EU owes it's existence to him.
You could say that about anyone. Redundant to the question of his influence.DaveC426913 said:Certainly, Freud had a hugely dramatic impact *on* his discipline, but I can't say it wouldn't have existed or wouldn't have progressed without him.
How about the man who started the reform of the CP Yuri Andropov.Andre said:Now, surprisingly, nobody voted for the man who terminated the cold war single handedly, and ended up almost forgotten as shown here after three pages.
Michael "Gorbi" Gorbatschow