MHB The number of possible permutations for the assessment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
AI Thread Summary
The assessment consists of four questions, each drawn from distinct pools of possible questions: 13 for question 1, 21 for question 2, 14 for question 3, and 12 for question 4. To calculate the total number of unique assessments without repeating questions, the fundamental counting principle applies, resulting in the formula 13 × 21 × 14 × 12. The initial suggestion of using 13 × 18 × 13 × 10 was incorrect, as it misrepresented the available question pools. It is important to note that the term "permutations" is not applicable here since the order of questions does not change. The final calculation yields a comprehensive count of possible assessments based on the distinct question pools.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
There are 4 questions in the assessment. In order not to repeat questions in an assessment, question 1 could be any of 13 questions, question 2 any of 21 questions, question 3 anyone of 14 questions and question 4 anyone of 12 questions. How do I calculate the number of possible permutations for the assessment? Is it 13 × 18 × 13 × 10?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
There are 4 questions in the assessment. In order not to repeat questions in an assessment, question 1 could be any of 13 questions, question 2 any of 21 questions, question 3 anyone of 14 questions and question 4 anyone of 12 questions. How do I calculate the number of possible permutations for the assessment? Is it 13 × 18 × 13 × 10?
We need to clarify. Are the 13 possible questions for #1 distinct from the 21 possible questions for #2? There are no questions in two different question pools? If so then, by the "fundamental counting principle", the number of tests, differing by at least one question, is 13(21)(14)(21).
I have no idea where you got "18 x 13 x 10". Also those are not "permutations" since you are not changing the order of the questions.
 
Since that's the whole question, probably we should just assume that those groups non-intersecting. Thanks.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top