The Paradox of Aging in Relativity: Resolving the Twin Paradox with a Twist

In summary: So in summary, A and B experience different amounts of acceleration based on their relative position at the beginning of the journey. If they were in the same frame, A would think that B had aged more than him. However, if they are in different frames, A's frame of reference tells him that B has aged less than him.
  • #106
pervect said:
Now, MTW doesn't even mention Dolby & Gull's coordinate system, while they do mention momentarily comoving inertial (MCMI) coordinate system. I would tend to agree that in terms of popularity, MCMI is more popular than Dolby & Gull. I would even say that I personally like it better than Doby & Gull. MTW also mentions in later sections a specific extension of the MCMI idea, called "Fermi Normal Coordinates", that I feel are very important. I tend to think of Fermi Normal coordinates as being "natural", but that's just my personal bias. People seem to have different ideas of what is "natural", and I don't believe it's too productive to argue about this.

It is interesting to note that in the GR context (rather than SR), radar coordinates have a long history. Synge, in the 1950s and 60s proved many interesting facts about them, in particular that they are experimentally indistinguishable from FN coordinates at the scale of wildly moving rocket (within the rocket), and that at the distance they become distinguishable from FN, each has nasty tradeoffs, so a preference is hard to justify.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
137
Views
8K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top