The picture in the addition, you see one integral equation and I have

opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
The picture in the addition, you see one integral equation and I have moved forward to solve it but when I tried to use patial integrant ( uv-∫v.du) I couldn't go further, Is there anyone to help me solving that equation.Actually, I stuck while putting the boundries
(from 0 to ∞ ) because it is not clear when sinus function goes ∞ what it will be,... anyway if you look at it you will see what I mean.

thanks
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0227.jpg
    DSC_0227.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 398
Physics news on Phys.org


th answer is (a*a)/(2*(1+a*a))
 


I think most people think that doesn't worth to give any answer to this easy question· i understand now
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top