- #1
Jeff Savage
- 17
- 0
The surface of Mars, the loss it’s of atmosphere and the fate of earth.
I think that what we would expect on Earth (the potential of the Earth's electro-magneto-dynamic) is not on Mars. We will not find a molten core, nor a strong atmosphere. The rotational speed of Mars is adequate but the degrees of tip of the axis as it faces the solar winds is such that creating or sustaining the electro-magneto-dynamic fired core will never again be possible. Without that dynamic in place there will never again be the possibility success of any terra-forming of Mars for any real life force. It may have been a shift in the poles of Mars of more or less than 23 degrees (a perfect angle of attack for optimal excitation/interaction of magnetic lines of flux working with an atmosphere) that creates the dynamo like potential creation that works to sustain a positive electro-gravonic attraction that would sustain atmospheres from aquatic to troposphere.
IT may have been a shift in polar location in relation to is axis that could have allowed Mar's atmosphere to escape or to Martian terrestrial conditions to deteriorate to the degree that its atmosphere to degrade to the levels we see today.
When you consider that clime changes have occurred in the Earth's past with such speed that animals have been found that had died or frozen to death so quickly they could not digest green vegetation before they gave in to hypothermia.
There can not be any clime change that could occur or be driven to such a instantaneous change other than by being provoked by a polar shift in its magnetic signature. This shift if, it aligned itself outside of the optimum 23 degrees, would have had such an instantaneous effect on weather patterns! It may be that the dynamic of atmospheric excitation to a solar wind in concert with attack angles of a rotating planet coupled with and created by and from a molten iron core can degrade or sustain climate conditions as we have seen presently or in the past.
Not only are solar winds a main contributing factor but the ability to a participating planet curtail for life as we know it today. All the factors as delicately balanced as we have enjoyed here on Earth can be thrown off for any of a number of events that could end life on Earth so fast that there would be nothing to do but to just watch.
The possibilities includes the complete loss of atmosphere, the cooling of the core at super fast rates, ice ages that occur in weeks or less and the raw invasion of high radiation which would bake the Earth like it has on Mars.
The moving of the location of magnetic poles on Earth would change the critical co-axle tilt of the earth’s attack angle to the sun’s solar wind and this will of course change the magnetic strength of the Earth as well as its gravitational signature as it relates to the moon staying within its orbit, the speed the Earth motors against the moon and eventually the stability of the Earth to refrain from ever growing “wobble” effect in its rotation as the moon translates to a ever father distance from earth.
Should we be asking ourselves what such sustained interests in man made changes to our atmosphere, our growing use of the Earth for a reference for the production of electricity and the pursuit of operations like HAARP has on the magnetic polar position stability?
Jeff Savage
I think that what we would expect on Earth (the potential of the Earth's electro-magneto-dynamic) is not on Mars. We will not find a molten core, nor a strong atmosphere. The rotational speed of Mars is adequate but the degrees of tip of the axis as it faces the solar winds is such that creating or sustaining the electro-magneto-dynamic fired core will never again be possible. Without that dynamic in place there will never again be the possibility success of any terra-forming of Mars for any real life force. It may have been a shift in the poles of Mars of more or less than 23 degrees (a perfect angle of attack for optimal excitation/interaction of magnetic lines of flux working with an atmosphere) that creates the dynamo like potential creation that works to sustain a positive electro-gravonic attraction that would sustain atmospheres from aquatic to troposphere.
IT may have been a shift in polar location in relation to is axis that could have allowed Mar's atmosphere to escape or to Martian terrestrial conditions to deteriorate to the degree that its atmosphere to degrade to the levels we see today.
When you consider that clime changes have occurred in the Earth's past with such speed that animals have been found that had died or frozen to death so quickly they could not digest green vegetation before they gave in to hypothermia.
There can not be any clime change that could occur or be driven to such a instantaneous change other than by being provoked by a polar shift in its magnetic signature. This shift if, it aligned itself outside of the optimum 23 degrees, would have had such an instantaneous effect on weather patterns! It may be that the dynamic of atmospheric excitation to a solar wind in concert with attack angles of a rotating planet coupled with and created by and from a molten iron core can degrade or sustain climate conditions as we have seen presently or in the past.
Not only are solar winds a main contributing factor but the ability to a participating planet curtail for life as we know it today. All the factors as delicately balanced as we have enjoyed here on Earth can be thrown off for any of a number of events that could end life on Earth so fast that there would be nothing to do but to just watch.
The possibilities includes the complete loss of atmosphere, the cooling of the core at super fast rates, ice ages that occur in weeks or less and the raw invasion of high radiation which would bake the Earth like it has on Mars.
The moving of the location of magnetic poles on Earth would change the critical co-axle tilt of the earth’s attack angle to the sun’s solar wind and this will of course change the magnetic strength of the Earth as well as its gravitational signature as it relates to the moon staying within its orbit, the speed the Earth motors against the moon and eventually the stability of the Earth to refrain from ever growing “wobble” effect in its rotation as the moon translates to a ever father distance from earth.
Should we be asking ourselves what such sustained interests in man made changes to our atmosphere, our growing use of the Earth for a reference for the production of electricity and the pursuit of operations like HAARP has on the magnetic polar position stability?
Jeff Savage