Programs Theoretical or just physics degree? Maths is sort of good, is that enough?

AI Thread Summary
Considering a shift to a Theoretical Physics course raises concerns about the heavy mathematical requirements. The appeal of theoretical physics lies in its scientific and philosophical aspects, but there is uncertainty about math proficiency, particularly with middling A grades in Pure Maths and C grades in Further Maths. The discussion emphasizes the importance of improving mechanics and pure math skills, as these are crucial for success in theoretical physics. Many universities allow switching between courses in the first year, which provides some reassurance. The advice leans towards retaking mechanics to strengthen the foundation for pursuing theoretical physics.
B.A. Maracas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, as you may have guessed I'm thinking of taking a Theoretical Physics course rather than just straight Physics, but that due to its maths-heavy nature I'm worried I might not cope all that well.
I mean, I love the idea of theoretical - admittedly it's a rather romanticised view of it - but it appeals both scientifically and philosophically, it seems wonderfully interesting and all that kind of thing (and it sounds cool when you tell people :-p). I could go on about why it sounds so great, but to be perfectly honest I can't be bothered at the moment.
However, I'm worried that my maths might not be up to it. In terms of A-Levels I'm getting middling A grades in Pure Maths but C grades in Further Maths (mechanics, statisitics, all that business)
I would be perfectly happy with straight physics, but ideally it'd have to be theoretical. I just don't know if I'm being unrealistic in going for it.

I know most universities say you can easily switch between courses in the first year, sometimes the second, but I'd like to get myself a clear idea of what, realistically, I want to be doing.

Thanks for any advice, this is probably a pretty common question, so sorry about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go for it, and pure maths is more important than stats and decision. Mechanics is quite important though, get that up. Just work harder and try and get your mechanics and pure modules as high as possible.
 
Thanks, I was kind of hoping someone would say something along those lines :P
And yeah, like you say, I'll go for retaking a bit of the old mechanics and that.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
Back
Top