Thermal Expansion of Bubbles in a Lake

AI Thread Summary
As two identical gas bubbles rise in a lake, bubble A ascends rapidly without exchanging heat, while bubble B rises slowly, maintaining thermal equilibrium with the water. The pressure difference between the lake bottom and surface causes both bubbles to expand, but the conditions they experience differ significantly. Bubble A undergoes adiabatic expansion, leading to a decrease in temperature and internal energy, while bubble B experiences isothermal expansion, keeping its temperature constant. Consequently, bubble B will be larger upon reaching the surface due to its ability to maintain thermal equilibrium and continuous heat exchange with the surrounding water. Understanding the principles of isothermal and adiabatic processes is crucial in analyzing the behavior of the bubbles.
Jeann25
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical bubbles of gas form at the bottom of a lake, then rise to the surface. Because the pressure is much lower at the surface than at the bottom, both bubbles expand as they rise. However, bubble A rises very quickly, so that no heat is exchanged between it and the water. Meanwhile, bubble B rises slowly (impeded by a tangle of seaweed), so that is always remains in thermal equilibrium with the water (which has the same temperature everywhere). Which of the two bubbles is larger by the time they reach the surface? Explain your reasoning fully.


Homework Equations


isothermic -> W=NkT ln(Vf/Vi)
adiabatic -> VfTf^f/2=ViTi^f/2

(side question: What program do you use, or how do you make the typed out equations more readable?)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that for isothermal, Q is positive because it's an expansion, and that W is negative because the volume is increasing.
For adiabatic, Q=0, and ΔU=W, and W is negative, so ΔU is negative. And I know that U is proportional to T, so ΔT is negative.

I'm not sure where to go from there. I tried substitution with this, since I know Vi is equal for both bubbles. So I tried solving for Vi for one, and substituting this in for the other, and seeing how the values were influenced. But that didn't seem to really help in any way. I'm having trouble doing this conceptually as well. I need some help on where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are making this harder for yourself than is needed. Remember: the pressures at the bottom and top are fixed (p1 and p2, say). What are the equations of state for the isothermal and adiabatic cases?
 
Are they:

isothermic -> W=NkT ln(Vf/Vi)
adiabatic -> NkdTf/2=-PdV

?
 
No. At least, not in the standard form.

Hint: The equation of state for an ideal gas under no constraints is: pV/T = constant.

What happens to this equation when you apply (i) isothermal, and (ii) adiabatic requirements?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top