(Thermal) Vibrational degrees of freedom

AI Thread Summary
For the CO2 molecule, there are 3 translational and 2 rotational degrees of freedom, leading to confusion about the vibrational degrees of freedom. The professor's assertion of 4 vibrational degrees of freedom aligns with the formula for linear molecules, which states there are 3N-5 modes, where N is the number of atoms. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding regarding the distinction between vibrational modes and degrees of freedom, as each vibrational mode contributes both kinetic and potential energy. The participant's calculation of 8 degrees of freedom mistakenly counts each mode twice, leading to an incorrect conclusion. Ultimately, clarity on the terminology and the correct application of the formulas is essential for accurate understanding.
argon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a molecule such as CO2, where there are three atoms and a linear structure. I understand that there are 3 translational degrees of freedom and 2 rotational degrees of freedom (since it's symmetric). However, the number of vibrational degrees of freedom (DoF) confuses me.

My professor says there are 4 DoF. A quick Google search has people claiming 4.

I think the answer is 8 though. There are 4 vibrational modes (if this is correct) for CO2, and each mode gets a DoF from kinetic energy and one from potential energy. This makes 8.

There are also some websites claiming that for a non-linear molecule, there are 3N-6 vibrational modes and for a linear molecule there are 3N-5 vibrational modes. Some websites call these vibrational degrees of freedom instead, but this terminology is important to distinguish since it changes my answer by a factor of 2. Which is correct?

Assume sufficiently high temperatures for this discussion such that no modes are frozen out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at DOF in another way... Try to find the minimum number of coordinates you need to know the exact position of CO2 molecule , there are three atoms with each having x,y coordinates. Assume that you know the distance between Carbon And oxygen atoms.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top