Thermodynamics - Change in temperature for heated slabs of steel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the change in temperature for heated slabs of steel using the formula involving mass, specific heat capacity, and heat energy. Initially, a mass of 700 kg and a heat input of 70,000 kJ were used, resulting in a calculated final temperature of 488.095°C, which is safe from melting. However, a participant questioned whether the total mass was correctly interpreted, suggesting it might be four slabs totaling 2,800 kg. After recalculating with this mass, the new change in temperature was found to be 59.5°C, leading to a final temperature of -190.476°C, indicating the steel would remain solid. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately determining mass in thermodynamic calculations.
CJoy
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Defiance Drake, Space Adventurer, has managed to lay claim to an abandoned freighter whose crew was killed by Cubarb parasites. She fired the engines of her craft for 30 seconds, which involved igniting unobtainium gas to propel the ship (in an action-reaction process). During this time, the engine cones absorbed some of the heat of this explosion. If one can approximate the engine cones as four slabs of 700 kg steel, 70000 kJ of heat was absorbed, and the initial temperature of the steel was -250 Celsius, what is the final temperature? Is the steel in danger of melting?
Relevant Equations
mass of object x change in temp x specific heat capacity= heat
Just started this topic so I'm not sure if this is the correct way to solve this, any help would be appreciated.
mass of object x change in temp x specific heat capacity= heat
change in temp= heat/(mass of object x specific heat capacity)
Mass= 700kg
Specific heat capacity of steel= 0.42kJ/kgC
heat=70000kJ
change in temp= temp final- temp initial
temp initial=-250C
change in temp= (70000)/(700 x 0.42)=238.095C
Temp final - temp initial= 238.095C
Temp final - (-250C)=238.095C
Temp final= 488.095C
Since steel's melting point is at 1370C, the steel is not in danger of melting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That procedure looks good, except I wonder if the total mass is 4x what you have used. Is it 4 slabs of 700 kg each or 4 slabs with a combined mass of 700 kg? Seems like the problem wouldn't mention the number of slabs if it gave the total mass.
 
Last edited:
CJoy said:
change in temp= temp final- temp initial
temp initial=-250C
change in temp= (70000)/(700 x 0.42)=238.095C
Temp final - temp initial= 238.095C
Temp final - (-250C)=238.095C
Temp final= 488.095C
Since steel's melting point is at 1370C, the steel is not in danger of melting.
Hi Cjoy. Better check your algebra. If you started at -250C and the change was 238C it will be below 0 C.

AM
 
With the changes, does this look correct?
Mass= 700kg x 4=2800kg
Specific heat capacity of steel= 0.42kJ/kgC
heat=70000kJ
change in temp= temp final- temp initial
temp initial=-250C
change in temp= (70000)/(2800 x 0.42)=59.5C
Temp final - temp initial= 59.5C
Temp final - (-250C)=59.5C
Temp final= -190.476C
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top