I Time dependence of kinetic energy in Lagrangian formulation

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy can depend explicitly on time within the Lagrangian formulation if the inertial Cartesian coordinates are functions of generalized coordinates that also vary with time. This scenario typically arises in non-inertial reference frames. The relationship is established through the time derivative of position, which incorporates both the generalized coordinates and their time derivatives. Consequently, the expression for kinetic energy becomes explicitly time-dependent. This highlights the complexity of kinetic energy in non-inertial frames within Lagrangian mechanics.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Could kinetic energy possibly depend explicitly on time in the lagrangian for some arbitrary set of generalized coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if the inertial Cartesian coordinates as functions of the generalized coordinates depend explicitly on time (describing the motion in a non-inertial frame of reference) you get from
$$\vec{x}=\vec{x}(q^k,t), \quad k \in \{1,\ldots,f \}$$
the time derivative (Einstein summation convention applies)
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\dot{q}^k \partial_k \vec{x} + \partial_t \vec{x}$$
and thus
$$T=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 = \frac{m}{2} \left (\dot{q}^k \partial_k \vec{x} + \partial_t \vec{x} \right)^2,$$
which is in general explicitly time dependent.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top