Time-dependent perturbation theory: hydrogen atom in electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of a hydrogen atom in its ground state transitioning to any n=2 states under a weak electric field using first-order perturbation theory. The perturbation is defined as H' = e*Eo * e^{-t/τ} * r cos(θ), and the only non-zero transition probability is found for the 2p state with m=0, while transitions to 2s and 2p states with m=±1 yield zero probability. This aligns with the dipole selection rules, which dictate that transitions must involve changes in the angular momentum quantum number (ℓ=1) and are influenced by the spherical harmonic components of the perturbation. The calculations confirm that the perturbation operator corresponds to the dipole operator, validating the results obtained. The discussion concludes with affirmation that the findings are consistent with established quantum mechanical principles.
adjklx
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Hydrogen atom in its ground state (n,l,m) = (1,0,0) is placed in a weak electric fieldE(t) = 0 if t < 0
Eo *e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}if t > 0E is in the positive z direction

What is the probability that it will be found in any of the n=2 states at time t > 0 ? use first order perturbation theory

Homework Equations



C^{(1)}_{ba} = \frac{1}{(i\hbar)} \int^t_0 H&#039;_{ba} e^{iw_{ba}t&#039;}dt&#039;

where H&#039;_{ba} is the (b,a) matrix element of the perturbation and w_{ba} = \frac{(E^{(0)}_b - E^{(0)}_a)}{\hbar}

The Attempt at a Solution



so basically i set up the schrodinger equation in spherical coordinates and added the perturbation H&#039; = e*Eo *e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}*rcos{\theta}

where e is the magnitude of the charge charge of an electron. i then evaluated C_{ba} for a = 1s and b = 2s, 2p0, 2p1, 2p-1 all separately.

i got H&#039;_{ba} = 0 for everything except 2p0, so the coefficients will be 0, for 2p0 i got this for the coefficient:

(\frac{e*Eo}{i\hbar3\sqrt{2}a^4_{\mu}})(\int^{\infty}_0 r^4 e^{\frac{-3r}{2a_{\mu}}}dr)(\frac{1}{\frac{i3\mu e^4}{128\pi^2 \epsilon^2_o\hbar^3} - \frac{1}{\tau}})(e^{t(\frac{i3\mu e^4}{128\pi^2\epsilon^2_0\hbar^3}-\frac{1}{\tau}]}-1)
<br /> a_{\mu} =\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o\hbar^2}{\mu e^2}<br />
<br /> \mu = reduced massand then just take the absolute value squared to get the probability of being found in that state at time t. i was wondering if i did this right? also sorry about using e for the exponential and the charge, if it has variables in its power then its the exponential, otherwise its charge.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
adjklx said:

Homework Statement



A Hydrogen atom in its ground state (n,l,m) = (1,0,0) is placed in a weak electric field


E(t) = 0 if t < 0
Eo *e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}if t > 0


E is in the positive z direction

What is the probability that it will be found in any of the n=2 states at time t > 0 ? use first order perturbation theory

Homework Equations



C^{(1)}_{ba} = \frac{1}{(i\hbar)} \int^t_0 H&#039;_{ba} e^{iw_{ba}t&#039;}dt&#039;

where H&#039;_{ba} is the (b,a) matrix element of the perturbation and w_{ba} = \frac{(E^{(0)}_b - E^{(0)}_a)}{\hbar}



The Attempt at a Solution



so basically i set up the schrodinger equation in spherical coordinates and added the perturbation H&#039; = e*Eo *e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}*rcos{\theta}

where e is the magnitude of the charge charge of an electron. i then evaluated C_{ba} for a = 1s and b = 2s, 2p0, 2p1, 2p-1 all separately.

i got H&#039;_{ba} = 0 for everything except 2p0, so the coefficients will be 0, for 2p0 i got this for the coefficient:

(\frac{e*Eo}{i\hbar3\sqrt{2}a^4_{\mu}})(\int^{\infty}_0 r^4 e^{\frac{-3r}{2a_{\mu}}}dr)(\frac{1}{\frac{i3\mu e^4}{128\pi^2 \epsilon^2_o\hbar^3} - \frac{1}{\tau}})(e^{t(\frac{i3\mu e^4}{128\pi^2\epsilon^2_0\hbar^3}-\frac{1}{\tau}]}-1)
<br /> a_{\mu} =\frac{4\pi\epsilon_o\hbar^2}{\mu e^2}<br />
<br /> \mu = reduced mass


and then just take the absolute value squared to get the probability of being found in that state at time t. i was wondering if i did this right? also sorry about using e for the exponential and the charge, if it has variables in its power then its the exponential, otherwise its charge.

I have not checked all your algebra, but the fact that the only n=2 transition is to 2p is correct (given the dipole form of the perturbation).

This is more generally called the "dipole selection rule" and it is comes about because of the cos(theta) in the perturbation which is proportional to Y_{10}.

Thus transitions from the ground-state must go to states with \ell=1.
 
oh it was actually asking for the probabilities for the individual n=2 orbitals
i received probabilities of 0 for 2s and the 2p orbitals corresponding to the quantum numbers m = +/- 1. the only non zero probability transition i received was for 2p corresponding to m = 0.

the field is just a uniform electric field in the z direction that decays with time so I'm not sure if the selection rules are the same for the dipole transition.
 
adjklx said:
oh it was actually asking for the probabilities for the individual n=2 orbitals
i received probabilities of 0 for 2s and the 2p orbitals corresponding to the quantum numbers m = +/- 1. the only non zero probability transition i received was for 2p corresponding to m = 0.

the field is just a uniform electric field in the z direction that decays with time so I'm not sure if the selection rules are the same for the dipole transition.

...And I am telling you that what you have found is correct and the this *is* the dipole selection rule.

Your perturbation is basically
<br /> -e\bold{E}\cdot\bold{x}\;,<br />
which *is* the dipole operator -e\bold{x} dotted with the field vector.

You have chosen the field to be in the z-direction and thus, like I said, the spherical harmonic (1,0) is the perturbation. thus the final state must have \ell=1 and m=0 for transtions from the ground state. More generally (e.g., for transitions from states other than ground) dipole selection rules hold.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top