Time Evolution of Measurables(Hamiltonian)

aim1732
Messages
428
Reaction score
2
Supposing a physical quantity f whose operator commutes with the Hamiltonian operator H, and supposing it has no explicit time dependence, then the result regarding the time derivative of the operators gives us that the quantity is conserved and its mean value does not change with time.The commutator being zero will also mean that the two quantities, f and energy can be measured simultaneously.Now if the system were subject to a time varying potential then the energy will not be conserved(because the Hamiltonian will have an explicit time dependence) but the quantity f is still conserved(according to the theorem).And the commutator should still be zero so that the energy changes but f does not, and they are still simultaneously measurable.How will the energy evolve in time?Will it become indefinite(considering we start with a definite-energy state) or will it continue to remain a definite energy(and also definite-f) state?Or does this depend on the potential the system is subject to?Is what i said above correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The measurement of f does not affect the statistics of the measurements of energy, so what is different - what are you asking? The time evolution of energy measurements would be the same as if you didn't know about f.
 
My bad.I mixed up questions and was talking something else.I think I have got it now,though.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top