Time-gap between Physics I and II

  • Thread starter Thread starter mege
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on concerns about the knowledge gap from taking Physics I over a decade ago and its potential impact on success in the upcoming Physics II course. The participant performed well in Calc-based Physics I but acknowledges a significant time lapse since then. They recently excelled in Calc III and are contemplating self-studying Physics I concepts to refresh their understanding. Key topics from Physics I, such as Newton's Laws, kinematics, energy, and torque, are noted as foundational for Physics II, which covers electromagnetism, optics, and waves. Responses emphasize the importance of a solid grasp of Physics I material for success in Physics II, suggesting that while some students manage to take both courses concurrently, a thorough review of Physics I is advisable to ensure a strong foundation.
mege
I took Calc-based Physics I over 10 years ago in my first academic life (and did well in it - it was other classes where my work ethic was immature :/). I am enrolled in Physics II for this fall and am a touch worried that the gap between classes in sequence may effect me. I just took Calc III (Multi-variable) this Spring, got an A, and was 1 of 3 to actually pass the class (out of 8). This, again, was after a 10 year gap since I took Calc II and Linear Algebra. I had a better idea about what to expect from Calc III, skill wise, and I prepared accordingly working through a pair of CalcI/II workbooks as refresher. I couldn't really apply anything from Physics I (that wouldn't have been covered in Calculus as examples) this moment without some significant refresher. I plan on self-studying Physics I concepts again in the near future, but I would put significantly more weight on it if there was any direct neccessity for success in Physics II.

Is there anything from Physics I that directly carries over into Physics II which I should be worried about?

(I think these are pretty 'normal' sequences for the intro physics courses with Physics I covering Newton's Laws, motion and energy; Physics II covering E&M, optics, and waves; and Physics III introducing relativity and quantum mechanics.)

Thanks for any responses ahead of time :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I took Physics II we had to use kinematics, energy, Newton's laws, and angular rotation material like torque.
 
Mmm_Pasta said:
When I took Physics II we had to use kinematics, energy, Newton's laws, and angular rotation material like torque.

Hmm, guess I will make sure to self-study my Physics I stuff.

Thanks!
 
I agree you should definitely go over it again, but as long as you're okay with the basics you should be okay (although if your unsure about it you should probably go over it thoroughly again anyways because it's really important to have a good foundation in the physics 1 material). When I was taking it there was someone who was taking physics II and physics I (For the first time) in the same semester - with an override, of course - and they did fine in the class.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top