Time-independence of seperable solutions of the Schrödinger eqn

  • Thread starter Thread starter Runei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schrödinger
Runei
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Hey there clever folk,

So I am taking a class in Quantum Mechanics, and I've just completed an assignment about seperable solutions to the schrödinger equation.

One of the questions was to show that seperable solutions give rise to time-independent probability densities.

So I was having the equation \left|{\psi(x,t)}\right|^2=\left|{T(t)}\right|^2\left|{\psi(x)}\right|^2

So the time dependence will be determined only by the function of t. What I did was simply to solve the differential equation I had earlier to find T, and then simply multiply T by its complex conjugate. However, one of the later questions were to actual derive T(t) so I began wondering if there were another way (perhaps quicker) way to show that the complex conjugate product of T(t) would be time independent.

What I arrived at was that since

i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}T(t) = E T(t)

T(t) = \frac{i\hbar}{E}\frac{d}{dt}T(t)

T^*(t) = \frac{-i\hbar}{E}\frac{d}{dt}T^*(t)

T(t) \cdot T^*(t) = \frac{\hbar^2}{E^2}\frac{d}{dt}T^*(t)\frac{d}{dt}T(t)

Therefore I was down to that the time dependence or independence had to be determined from the product

\frac{dT^*}{dt}\frac{dT}{dt}

Am I on a completely wild goose hunt? Or is there something about it? When I arrived here I was like "I don't think I have heard about that a product of complex conjugate derivatives cancel".

Rune
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You almost had it but went in the wrong direction halfway through. Go back to the step where you had ##\frac{dT}{dt} = \frac{-iE}{\hbar}T## and solve the DE (it's trivial). The result will be a unitary time evolution.
 
I'd suggest the obvious. Start with (d/dt)|T(t)|2 and see if you can show it is zero.
 
Thank you for the answers.

@WannabeNewton, I actually did that already :) And by multiplying with the complex conjugate, everything with t disappeared, so that was great. However, in the assignments, a later question was to solve the differential equation and get the function of T(t). So I was wondering if the people behind the assignments had another way in mind, to show the time independence of the probability density, or some kind of reasoning :)

@Bill_K, I'll try to give it a shot :)
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top