I Time of flight measurement uncertainty

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the mean of a time-of-flight (tof) distribution generated by electrons from a 3D Gaussian source. The uncertainty in the measurement is influenced by both the detector's resolution and the source's standard deviation. It is confirmed that with sufficient statistical events, the mean can be extracted with an uncertainty better than the detector's resolution. The relationship between uncertainty and the number of events follows the principle of σ/√N, where σ represents the combined uncertainty. This statistical approach is likened to biased coin flips, illustrating the underlying mathematical principles.
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty.

The distribution of tofs is a gaussian, with the mean being what I need for my measurement and a standard deviation which has contributions from both the standard deviation of the source and the resolution of the tof detector. Is it possible, if I have enough events, to extract the the mean of this tof distribution with an uncertainty better than the resolution of the detector, or that would always be the best I can do? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
Is it possible, if I have enough events, to extract the the mean of this tof distribution with an uncertainty better than the resolution of the detector, or that would always be the best I can do? Thank you!
Yes. With enough statistics you can measure the mean accurately below the resolution of your detector. By resolution, I take it you mean the resolution on the time-of-flight?
 
Twigg said:
Yes. With enough statistics you can measure the mean accurately below the resolution of your detector. By resolution, I take it you mean the resolution on the time-of-flight?
Thank you! Yes, the tof resolution. So should I expect the uncertainty to go like ##\sigma/\sqrt{N}##, where N is the number of events and ##\sigma## is the combined uncertainty (i.e. the detector resolution and the uncertainty in the position of creation of individual electrons)?
 
Yep! If you want mathematical proof for it, it's just the same statistics as a biased coin flip, where "heads" and "tails" refer to adjacent time bins of your detector on either side of the true tof value.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top