TLC plate in regards to polarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter CML
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plate Polarity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of a normal phase alumina TLC plate to separate pigments from tomato paste, specifically xanthophyll, beta carotene, and lycopene. The initial observation indicated that xanthophyll traveled the furthest, which contradicted the expectation that the least polar substance would move the most on a polar plate. The user detailed their extraction process, which involved liquid-liquid extraction and microscale chromatography, and described the relative positions of the pigments on the TLC plate. Ultimately, the user clarified that their initial assumption was incorrect; beta carotene, not xanthophyll, was the pigment that traveled the furthest. The conversation highlights the complexities of TLC and the importance of careful observation and analysis in pigment separation.
CML
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I used a "normal" phase alumina TLC plate with 20% (v/v) dichloromethane/hexanes. I found the substance that traveled the furthest to be the most polar one (though the substance is not very polar, xanthohyll). Why would this be? I was under the impression that since the plate is polar and a nonpolar solution is used, the most polar substance would move the least. (Of course it is possible I made a mistake and the spot that moved the furthest is not the most polar one, and may have been beta carotenes, but I am almost positive I am right.)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What are you trying to separate and how do you know that the one that moved the furthest on the plate is xanthohyll?
 
gravenewworld said:
What are you trying to separate and how do you know that the one that moved the furthest on the plate is xanthohyll?

I did two spots, one was crude tomato paste and another was lycopene extracted from tomato paste. The TLC looked something like:



X


L
C

| |
Crude Extract

(Edit: I cannot get the TLC to look right, when I actually post. The second "|" should be above "Extract", and the "L" should also be above "Extract". All relative positions are correct)
Where I think:
X = xanthophyll more of a yellow colour
C = beta carotene more of a orange colour
L = lycopene also more of a orange colour

Due to the colour of the dots, I deduced that X is likely xanthopyll has it has a yellow pigment (similarly for the other two dots too)
 
Last edited:
This is too difficult to tell what is going on without the lab procedure and a picture of your TLC plate.
 
I will do my best to explain the procedure in as little detail as possible.
Pigments (lycopene, xanthophyll and beta caroetene) were extracted from tomato paste via a multistep liquid-liquid extraction (including a sep funnel) and a microscale chromatography. The microscale chromatography separted these pigments (all that was collected was the lycopene fractionsm the other two pigments were discarded). This fraction (along with the solution it was eluted with (10% ethyl acetate in hexanes)) was boiled in order to evaportate the 10% ethyl acetate in hexanes and therefore concentrate the lycopene.

This extract was then spotted on a normal plase alumina TLC plate along with a pre-prepared crude sample (I assume prepared in a similar manner; however, I do not know as I did not do prepare this).


As for the TLC plate, I cannot upload a picture of it, but I can try to explain it in more detail.

(solvent front)

X



C


Crude

(solvent front)




X



Extract

Where extract and Crude are actually on same TLC plate side by side.
X = xanthophyll more of a yellow colour- moved 2.92 cm
C = beta carotene more of a orange colour - moved 1.71 cm
L = lycopene also more of a orange colour - moved 1.90 cm
Solven front moved 3.40 cm
In terms of pigment colours, xanthophyll has a yellow colour, lycopene has a red/orange colour and beta carotene has a yellow orange colour

I do not see colours all that well, so of course it may be possible that the colours are wrong, but to me that is how they looked.


However, is my original idea correct, that the least polar substance should travel the furthest?
 
Thanks for your help, but I figured the question out. Turns out that xanthophyll was NOT what traveled the furthest, and it was infact catoene.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top