To find the forces on a composite object

In summary, Mitch's diagram wrongly shows u (the coefficient of friction) to be the same at both points of contact. Since this image was taken he has realized that, it does not affect the following where he refers the coefficient of fruition at C as v. For the first part of the question the answer in the book is "8W/45 at all points of contact". I have done that part and agree with the book answer. I obtain F = uR = vS = 8W/45 Intermediate results which I derived and used on the way are that: S = 8w/15 and that R = 23w/15. Also cos(2ɵ)=4/5 and sin(2ɵ)=
  • #1
gnits
137
46
Homework Statement
To find the forces on a composite object
Relevant Equations
moments
Could I please ask for help with the following:

c.jpg


Here's a diagram:

b.jpg


(in what follows, for clarity, I write L to represent the lower case L of the diagram).

My diagram wrongly shows u (the coefficient of friction) to be the same at both points of contact. Since this image was taken I have realized that, it does not affect the following where I refer the coefficient of fruition at C as v.

For the first part of the question the answer in the book is "8W/45 at all points of contact".

I have done that part and agree with the book answer. I obtain F = uR = vS = 8W/45

Intermediate results which I derived and used on the way are that: S = 8w/15 and that R = 23w/15. Also cos(2ɵ)=4/5 and sin(2ɵ)=3/5

For the last part (in this part the coefficient of friction at both points of contact are the same = u) I reasoned that I would balance the horizontal forces acting on the cylinder, like so:

uR + uS*cos(2ɵ) - S*sin(2ɵ)=0

substituting in for S, R, cos(2ɵ) and sin(2ɵ) from above formulae leads to u = 8/49

not 8/21.

Have I made an arithmetic error or have I erroneously applied the wrong physics?

Thanks for any help,
Mitch.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your diagram is a little hard to read. It would be clearer if you drew separate free-body diagrams for the plank and the sphere. I agree with your answers for the normal forces S and R.

You should not assume that a static friction force ##f_s## is always related to the normal force ##N## as ##f_s = \mu N##. The correct relation is ##f_s \leq \mu N##.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and Steve4Physics
  • #3
Hi @gnits. I’d like to add a few thoughts...

As @TSny has indicated, the coefficients of friction are not used for the first part of the question. The system is not about to slip. So the coefficient(s) of friction should not appear in the working.
______________

For example, imagine you (weight say 600N) are standing on horizontal ice.

Your friend X applies a horizontal 10N force on you. You do not slide. ##F_{friction}## between you and the ice is therefore 10N as you are still in equilibrium.

X increases the applied force to 20N. You still do not move. ##F_{friction}## has therefore increased to 20N.

X increases the force to 30N. You are now just about to start sliding. (E.g. force of 30.00001N would make you slide). ##F_{friction}## is now 30N and this is the limiting frictional force. The coefficient of static friction is 30/600 = 0,05 and is defined only for this limiting case.
______________

For the second part of the question, note that there are 3 points of contact (point A as well as the 2 contact points on the cylinder).

[I guess that’s why the answer to the first part refers to ‘all’ points of contact. But I think you have considered only 2 – because you used the word ‘both’. So you may still need to find the frictional force at point A.]

There are are various ways sliding could start:
- sliding at point A only;
- sliding at point B only;
- sliding at point O only (I think your diagram shows point ‘O’ at the bottom of the cylinder)’
as well the possibilities of simultaneous sliding at 2 or 3 points of contact.

So I guess you are meant to identify which mode of siding is going to occur first and use that to find μ.
 
  • #4
Thanks for you detailed answer. I'll get back to it later and let you know how I got on.
 
  • #5
Well, I'm a little closer to the answer:

Firstly, yes, as Steve4Physics says, A is also a point of contact. And by resolving horizontally on the system as a whole I also get that X = 8w/45. So that completes the first part of the question.

I still believe that my analysis of the cylinder alone, balancing the horizontal forces, which leads to u = 8/49 seems correct. So this would say that, for no slipping at point of contact between cylinder and ground we require u >= 8/49 = 0.163 (to 3 decimal places).

But, taking Steve4Physics' advice made me realize that the rod may slip before the cylinder does. So I balanced the horizontal forces on the rod as follows:

X - S * sin(2ɵ) + u*S * cos(2ɵ) = 0, this leads to u = 1/3. which is greater than 8/49 and so slipping would occur here first, i.e. to not-slip here would require u >= 1/3 = 0.333 (to 3 decimal places) , but this is slightly different to books answer of u >= 8/21 = 0.381 (to 3 decimal places).

I tried balancing vertically for rod only, get same result of u = 1/3.

Would anybody be able to show me where I am reasoning wrongly?
 
  • #6
If you know the static friction force f and the normal force N at a point of contact, what can you say about the possible values of u at that point of contact?

As a numerical example, suppose f = 2.0 Newtons and N = 8.0 Newtons. What is the range of possible values for u?

Since you know the friction force and the normal force at each of the three contact points in this problem, you can do this type of analysis at each of the points and compare results.
 
  • #7
Big thanks to both of you for your help. I needed each piece of advice. I get it and agree with the book's answer. Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny

FAQ: To find the forces on a composite object

What is a composite object?

A composite object is a combination of multiple individual objects that are connected or interact with each other in some way.

How do you calculate the forces on a composite object?

To calculate the forces on a composite object, you must first identify all the individual objects and the forces acting on each one. Then, you can use vector addition to find the net force on the composite object.

What is the difference between external and internal forces on a composite object?

External forces are those that act on the composite object from outside, such as gravity or a push from another object. Internal forces are those that act between the individual objects within the composite object, such as tension in a rope connecting two objects.

How do you account for the direction of forces on a composite object?

The direction of forces on a composite object can be determined by using vector addition. Each individual force has a specific direction, and the net force on the composite object will be in the direction of the resultant vector after adding all the individual forces.

Can the forces on a composite object change over time?

Yes, the forces on a composite object can change over time if the individual objects within the composite object are in motion or if external forces are applied. This can result in a change in the net force and acceleration of the composite object.

Back
Top