Topology, lemiscate not an embedded submanifold

  • Thread starter BrainHurts
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Topology
In summary, the image of the curve β: (-π,π) → ℝ2 is not an embedded submanifold of ℝ2 because the inclusion map from the image of β to ℝ2 is not a smooth embedding due to mismatched tangent spaces at certain points. This is shown using the theorem that states an immersed submanifold must also have a well-defined tangent space at each point.
  • #1
BrainHurts
102
0

Homework Statement



Show that the image of the curve Let β: (-π,π) → ℝ2 be given by β(t) = (sin2t, sint)
is not an embedded submanifold of ℝ2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm not too great with the topology. I do see that β'(t) = (2cos2t, cost) ≠ 0 for all t. So β is a regular curve and as a result β is an immersion.

So here's what I have to work with.

A subset S of M is an embedded submanifold of M if:
- S is a smooth Manifold ( the image of (-π,π) under β is smooth)
-the inclusion map S to M is a smooth embedding

So this means that the topology of S (in our case β(-π,π)) is the subspace topology coming from M (in our case ℝ2)

We declare a set U[itex]\subset[/itex]β(-π,π) is open if and only if there exists a set W[itex]\subset[/itex]ℝ2 (namely the open discs) such that

U = W [itex]\cap[/itex] S

So to be more specific let's take U = β(-π/6, π/6), this set includes the origin.

Let W be the open unit disc B(0,1) which includes the origin. I've done a lot of reading where if we remove the origin we have trouble, not really seeing how W [itex]\cap[/itex] S will look like the letter X. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Firstly, great job on recognizing that the image of β is a smooth curve and that β is an immersion. This is an important step in showing that the image is not an embedded submanifold.

To show that the image of β is not an embedded submanifold, we can use the following theorem:

Theorem: Let M and N be smooth manifolds and let F: M --> N be a smooth map. If F is an immersion, then the image of F is an immersed submanifold of N.

In our case, we know that β is an immersion, so the image of β is an immersed submanifold of ℝ2. However, to be an embedded submanifold, the inclusion map from the image of β to ℝ2 must also be a smooth embedding.

To show that this is not the case, we can use the fact that an embedded submanifold must have a well-defined tangent space at each point. In other words, the tangent space at any point on the submanifold must be equal to the tangent space of the ambient space at that point.

However, for the image of β, this is not the case. Consider the point (0,0) on the image of β. The tangent space at this point is given by the span of the vector (0,0) (since the derivative of β is zero at this point). However, the tangent space of ℝ2 at the point (0,0) is given by the entire ℝ2. Therefore, the tangent spaces do not match up, and the inclusion map is not a smooth embedding.

In conclusion, the image of β is not an embedded submanifold of ℝ2.
 

FAQ: Topology, lemiscate not an embedded submanifold

What is Topology?

Topology is a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of geometric shapes that are unaffected by continuous deformations, such as stretching, twisting, and bending.

What is a lemiscate?

A lemiscate is a curve that resembles the shape of a figure-eight and is often referred to as the "lemniscate of Bernoulli". It was first introduced by mathematician Jakob Bernoulli in the 17th century.

What does it mean for a lemiscate to not be an embedded submanifold?

An embedded submanifold is a subset of a larger topological space that has a smooth structure, meaning it can be described by a set of equations. If a lemiscate is not an embedded submanifold, it means that it cannot be described by a set of equations and is a more complex shape.

What are some examples of lemiscates not being embedded submanifolds?

One example is the "lemniscate of Gerono", which has a point of self-intersection and cannot be described by a single set of equations. Another example is the "lemniscate of Booth", which is a lemiscate with an infinite number of points of self-intersection.

How is the concept of non-embedded submanifolds relevant in topology?

The study of non-embedded submanifolds is important in topology because it helps to understand the limitations and complexities of shapes that cannot be easily described by equations. It also allows for the development of new mathematical tools and techniques to study these shapes and their properties.

Back
Top