Torque and angular accelerationfinding coeff. of friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction between an ax and a grindstone, given specific parameters such as the grindstone's dimensions, mass, and angular velocity. The initial calculations for angular acceleration and friction coefficient were incorrect due to the use of the wrong moment of inertia formula for a disk. The correct moment of inertia for a solid disk is I = (MR^2)/2, which led to a revised coefficient of friction of 0.482 instead of the initially calculated 0.964. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding angular momentum and encouraged persistence in mastering the concept. Overall, the thread highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations and the value of peer support in resolving misunderstandings.
offbeatjumi
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem states: grindstone in shape of solid disk with diameter .52m and mass 52 kg rotates at 850 rev/min. You press an ax against the rim with normal force 160 N and grindstone comes to rest in 7.5 s. Find coefficient of friction between ax and grindstone.


Homework Equations



The sum of all torques t = I*alpha (angular accel). = alpha*mass*radius^2
avg.angular.accel = (change in angular velocity)/(change in time)
850 rpm = 89 rad/s


The Attempt at a Solution



Using Newton's second law I get the sum of external forces = m*a(tangential) = m*r*alpha = (mu)_k*n
(mu)_k = (mass*radius*alpha)/n = 0.964

The answer in the book is half of the answer I got, 0.482. Where did I miss this? Thanks so much =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Easy, it seems like your moment of inertia is wrong. If I'm not mistaken you're currently using I=MR^2. Which is the moment of inertia for a thin hoop, not a disk.

A disk has the moment of inertia I= (MR^2)/2... half of what you're using =)
 
Thanks, that was a silly mistake.
I feel completely stupid asking this now but i returned to the question and I don't see how I was using moment of inertia to answer my question.
It just seems that what I did was solve for ang.accel by taking the change in ang.vel. over change in time to get 11.87 rad/s. Then I equated the sum of ext.forces = f(k) = ma(tangential) = m*r*ang.accel.
since f(k) = mu_k*n... so mu_k = (m*r*ang.accel)/n .
Thank you so much, I'm just having a massive mental block.
 
Don't worry about it, angular momentum can be a hard concept but I recommend working hard at it. It will come a lot in physics from now on =)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top