Torques on a Ruler Homework: Find Unknown Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeachBanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a ruler balanced at its center with a 10 g coin at the zero mark and an unknown mass at the 4.7 cm mark, requiring the calculation of the unknown mass for equilibrium. The counterclockwise torque was calculated correctly, but there was confusion regarding the placement of the zero mark and the use of gravitational acceleration. The participant initially calculated the unknown mass as 1.7 g, which seemed incorrect given the positioning of the coins. After further consideration, a revised estimate of approximately 18 g was suggested, aligning with the expectation that the closer mass should be heavier. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying torque principles to solve equilibrium problems.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A centimeter ruler, balanced at its center point, has two coins placed on it, as shown in the figure. One coin, of mass 10 g , is placed at the zero mark; the other, of unknown mass , is placed at the 4.7 cm mark. The center of the ruler is at the 3.0 cm mark. The ruler is in equilibrium; it is perfectly balanced.

Find the unknown mass.

Homework Equations



τ = F * r

The Attempt at a Solution



I set the zero mark to be in a center of the ruler. Then I tried to compute the counterclockwise Torque.

τ = (0.01 kg)(0.03 m)(9.8 m/s^2)

I'm really unsure about using the acceleration due to gravity. Should I have been using τ = Iα instead? I figure if I know how to properly find the counterclockwise torque, the clockwise torque will follow the same method.
 

Attachments

  • RulerTorques.jpg
    RulerTorques.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,410
Physics news on Phys.org
No, your method is fine. The Force term is given by F=mg.

You said you put your zero point in the centre of the ruler. But the question says that the centre is at 3.0cm. Your calculation for the counterclockwise moment is still correct though, as the zero point is 3cm from the fulcrum.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the problem did say to put the zero mark at the end but I thought it would be easier to put it in the middle since I wouldn't have to worry about that force. Here's what I've done so far:

counterclockwise torque = (0.01 kg)(0.03m)(9.8 m/s^2)
counterclockwise torque = 0.00294 N * M

clockwise torque = (x kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.017 m)
0.00294 N * M (I did this because in order for the ruler to be in equilibrium the torques must cancel)= (x kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.017 m)

0.00294 N * M = 0.1666 1/s^2 * (x kg)
x = 0.017 kg

They want the answer in grams though so x = 1.7 g. This doesn't make sense because the second mass is closer to the pivot point which means it must have more mass than 10 g.
 
1kg=1000g :smile:
 
Wowowowowowowowow! Haha, I think ≈ 18 g sounds a bit better.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top