MHB Total Angular Momentum of a Tractrix

Dr Edward
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have a 5.0 m tractrix and am trying to work out angular momentum and total angular momentum for two hitchpoint speeds 60 & 70 km/h.
My result shows a higher total angular momentum for the lower speed.
This is not what I expected.
Here are my equations
Positions:
View attachment 8589
Derivatives
View attachment 8590
Angular velocity
View attachment 8591
Angular Momentum
View attachment 8592
TOTAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM
View attachment 8593
If anyone can help spot the error I would be extremely grateful
 

Attachments

  • Positions.JPG
    Positions.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 115
  • Derivatives.JPG
    Derivatives.JPG
    5.7 KB · Views: 120
  • Ang Vel.JPG
    Ang Vel.JPG
    11.3 KB · Views: 120
  • Ang Momentum.JPG
    Ang Momentum.JPG
    12.6 KB · Views: 127
  • Total Mom.JPG
    Total Mom.JPG
    11.5 KB · Views: 115
Physics news on Phys.org
I have spotted the error but don't know how to fix it.
The equation for L(t) is for instantaneous angular momentum.
Momentum is cumulative. i.e. if I add an impulse (F*t) to the classic linear analogy I impart momentum. Newton's 1st law says it will go on forever.
If I now hit it with the same impulse I will double the momentum.
Is there any mathematical genius that will convert the equation for instant angular momentum (L(t)) to total or cumulative momenta.

I should be ever so grateful.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top