Total Internal Reflection and Transmitted Wavelength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the wavelength of a normally polarized wave transmitted through a glass/air interface, focusing on the refractive index and phase continuity. The user has derived the equation λ_t = n_1/n_2 λ_i but is confused about the differences in calculations for the critical angle and an incidence angle of π/3. They express uncertainty about the relevance of Snell's law in this context, despite having calculated the critical angle for the interface. The forum emphasizes the need for users to demonstrate their efforts and follow homework guidelines to receive assistance. Clarity on the application of Snell's law and phase continuity in this scenario is sought for further understanding.
vera1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the transmitted wavelength of a normally polarised wave incident at the critical angle at a glass/air interface as a function of n_1, and do the same for an incident angle of pi/3
Relevant Equations
Fresnel's equations and solutions to maxwell's equations in a non-conducting medium
1712407921725.png

In my electrodynamcis assignment I'm being asked to derive the wavelength of the normally polarised wave transmitted through a glass/air interface as a function of ##n_1## (the refractive index of the first medium) using the concept of phase continuity and the fact that maxima should be equal at the interface. I've tried to derive it and keep getting ##\lambda_t = n_1/n_2 \lambda_i##. I've been asked to do this for the critical angle and for an angle of incidence equal to π/3, but I don't see how there can be a difference if Snell's law causes the incident angle to cancel out? I think I'm definitely missing something. We've derived equations for the transmitted, reflected and incident waves in class, as well as Fresnel's equations. To use Snell's law feels a bit below our current level. If it helps, I've calculated the critical angle for the glass/air interface to be 0.729 rad.

Any help would be appreciated, thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top