Transient heat conduction of a semi-infinite solid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a transient heat conduction problem in a semi-infinite solid, where the surface temperature changes suddenly. The key steps involve deriving the energy equation, establishing initial and boundary conditions, and defining new variables to simplify the problem. The approach recommended is a similarity transformation to convert the partial differential equation into an ordinary differential equation by expressing the dimensionless temperature in terms of a combined variable. Participants emphasize the importance of eliminating the time variable and correctly applying the chain rule for derivatives. The final challenge is solving a common differential equation to express the temperature as a function of the new variable.
mudweez0009
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



This is a problem regarding transient heat conduction in an undefined semi-infinite solid, initially at a temperature T0 whose surface temperature is suddenly raised to a new constant level at Ts.
I also supplied the problem as an attachment for ease in explaining the problem.
We want to:
  1. Derive the Energy Equation
  2. State initial and boundary conditions
  3. Define two new variables
    1. η=Cxtm
    2. θ=(T-T0)/(Ts-T0)
  4. Determine C and m (the constants?) of η and θ from Part 3
  5. Solve for η and θ themselves.
I understand and completed Parts 1 and 2 of this problem. Unfortunately I don't understand how to begin Part 3... I assume its a method of Separation of Variables?

Transient Heat Conduction.PNG


Homework Equations


There are a decent amount of equations for transient heat conduction, but I don't think Parts 3, 4, and 5 relate to any specific equation. I think its a method (I forget the name) of where you define new equations so that you can re-define the variables, then plug into the original Energy equation (shown in Part 1).

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I've tried so far. I am getting very lost on what variables to solve for, which ones to take derivatives of, etc... I would appreciate it if someone could help me get started if I'm wrong, or point me in the right direction if I am on the right track. Thanks in advance.

upload_2015-4-2_10-34-27.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not a separation of variables problem. The approach they are trying to lead you through is called a similarity transformation. They are trying to help you transform the differential equation from a partial differential equation to an ordinary differential equation by means of a change of independent variable. The original independent variables are combined in such a way that, when you apply the transformation, they form a single independent variable. In part 3, what they want you to try is to transform the problem from a PDE to an ODE by expressing the dimensionless temperature θ uniquely in terms of the combined variable η of the form:

θ = θ(η)

If you can do this without any t's or x's remaining in the transformed equation, then you can solve the resulting ODE for the dimensionless temperature profile in terms of η. You need to choose a value of m to get rid of the t in the transformed equation. And you need to choose a value of C to work the equation into the form that they have provided. That's what they want you to do in part 4.

Chet
 
Okay so I get that we need to get rid of the "x's" because the final equation we want in Part 3 does not have an x. However, it does have a "t". So I'm not sure I understand the reason why I would guess an "m" that would eliminate the "t".

Is the initial approach I took correct?
Do I need to do anything with θ? I'm not sure how the final equation has dθ/dη and d2θ/dη2 in it, when θ is only in terms of T, not η.
 
Your equation for ##\frac{\partial ^2 θ}{\partial x^2}## is incomplete. You need to apply the chain rule here too. After you do this, you get:

$$\frac{\partial θ}{\partial t}=\frac{dθ}{dη}mCxt^{m-1}=\alpha C^2t^{2m}\frac{d^2θ}{dη^2}$$

But, ##η=Cxt^m##

So you can substitute ##x=\frac{η}{Ct^m}##.

Substitute that, and see what this leaves you with.

Chet
 
Sorry for the late reply, I was actually in the midst of studying for the PE Exam, which I took on Friday, so I didnt have time to get to this until now. I did however get through Parts1 through 4, and am fairly confident in my answer. I am stuck on solving Part 5, where you have to solve d2θ/dη2+2η(dθ/dη)=0, to obtain θ as a functino of η.
I believe this is somewhat of a common diff. eq. problem, but my diff. eq. is rusty to say the least!
 
Hint: Substitute u=dθ/dη

Chet
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top