Transmission over a linear barrier (QM)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the transmission coefficient T for a quantum mechanical plane wave encountering a linear potential barrier defined by an electric field. The user sets up the problem using Schrödinger's equation and boundary conditions, leading to a matrix formulation. Despite using MATLAB for symbolic solutions, the calculated transmission coefficient consistently exceeds 1, raising concerns about potential errors in the math or coding. The user expresses uncertainty about the variable change and seeks clarification, while also referencing external resources for verification. The thread highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the importance of careful calculations in solving such problems.
cc94
Messages
19
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a potential such that $$
V =
\left\{
\!
\begin{aligned}
0 & \text{ if } x<0\\
\mathcal{E}x & \text{ if } x>0, x<L\\
\mathcal{E}L & \text{ if } x>L
\end{aligned}
\right.
$$

for some electric field ##\mathcal{E}##. I'm trying to find the transmission coefficient ##T## for a plane wave incoming from the left.

Homework Equations


Solving Schrodinger's equations, I believe we have:
$$
\psi =
\left\{
\!
\begin{aligned}
Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx} & ; x<0\\
C\text{Ai}(\zeta) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta) & ; x>0, x<L\\
Fe^{i\kappa x} & ; x>L
\end{aligned}
\right.
$$

Where ##\zeta## is a change of variable involving ##x##, ##E##, and ##\mathcal{E}##, and we only keep a forward traveling wave for the region ##x>L##. Since one of the coefficients is arbitrary, we can choose ##F## = 1

Then we have boundary conditions:
$$\psi_I(0) = \psi_{II}(0) \\
<=> A + B = C\text{Ai}(\zeta_0) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta_0)$$
$$\psi_I'(0) = \psi_{II}'(0) \\
<=> ik(A - B) = C\text{Ai}'(\zeta_0)(\zeta'_0) + D\text{Bi}'(\zeta_0)(\zeta'_0)$$
$$\psi_{II}(L) = \psi_{III}(L) \\
<=> C\text{Ai}(\zeta_L) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta_L) = e^{i\kappa L}$$
$$\psi_{II}'(L) = \psi_{III}'(L) \\
<=> C\text{Ai}'(\zeta_L)(\zeta'_L) + D\text{Bi}'(\zeta_L)(\zeta'_L) = i\kappa e^{i\kappa L}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Then we get the matrix (using a little bit of shorthand):

$$\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -\text{Ai}_0 & -\text{Bi}_0 & 0 \\
ik & -ik & -\text{Ai}'_0\zeta '_0 & -\text{Bi}'_0\zeta '_0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \text{Ai}_L & \text{Bi}_L & e^{i\kappa L} \\
0 & 0 & \text{Ai}'_L\zeta '_L & \text{Bi}'_L\zeta '_L & i\kappa e^{i\kappa L}
\end{bmatrix}$$

I used MATLAB to solve this symbolically, and then we know that ##T = \lvert\frac{F}{C}\rvert ^2 = \frac{1}{|C| ^2}##. So I plugged in various energies above the highest V and plotted T. But the transmission turns out to always be larger than 1, which makes no sense. Is my math wrong, or do I need to find a typo in my code somewhere? Has anyone solved this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I finally found the answer here: http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.11582[/URL]. I don't know how he got it, because even using a diff eq solver I couldn't get that result. But I'll assume it's correct and I'm just missing something.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top