Transverse velocity and real/imaginary parts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the transverse velocity of a particle as described in a mechanics textbook. The user is struggling to derive expressions for the real and imaginary parts of the transverse velocity, specifically v_x and v_y. They express confusion about how to start the problem and mention feeling overwhelmed in their new Mechanics course. Other participants encourage the user to provide specific excerpts from the textbook to facilitate better assistance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of making an attempt at the solution to receive constructive help.
SpaceIsCool
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The transverse velocity of the particle in Sections 2.5 and 2.7 is contained in (2.77), since
WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg
By taking the real and imaginary parts, find expressions for v_x and v_y separately. Based on these expressions describe the time dependence of the transverse velocity.

Homework Equations



WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I really don't know how to start this problem. In my textbook, it starts to show a solution but the whole "real and imaginary parts" aspect of this problem is really throwing me off.
 

Attachments

  • WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg
    WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg
    1 KB · Views: 646
  • WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg
    WVnxXbWKNcyke16CnzTE91JN8hoJzAZv94LmycMPhIKYWNaGr0_5S1hho3X_ErVDHz1QqihTun8iosLDmMNkGcIgXo8fafOa.jpg
    1 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
SpaceIsCool said:
The transverse velocity of the particle in Sections 2.5 and 2.7

Of what textbook?

SpaceIsCool said:
I really don't know how to start this problem.

Unfortunately, that's not an attempt at a solution. You need to make one. You say your textbook starts to show a solution: have you tried to work past it? Where specifically did you get stuck?
 
PeterDonis said:
Of what textbook?
Unfortunately, that's not an attempt at a solution. You need to make one. You say your textbook starts to show a solution: have you tried to work past it? Where specifically did you get stuck?
Hello,
It doesn't really show a solution. It just talks about how to derive the equation given. I'm just not sure how to start this problem at all. I just started this Mechanics course and am feeling a bit out of depth. The textbook is Classical Mechanics by John R. Taylor.
 
SpaceIsCool said:
It doesn't really show a solution. It just talks about how to derive the equation given. I'm just not sure how to start this problem at all. I just started this Mechanics course and am feeling a bit out of depth. The textbook is Classical Mechanics by John R. Taylor.
Can you post a PDF of the page or two that contains this? That would be a big help for folks who would like to help. You can use the UPLOAD button in the lower right of the Reply window to attach a PDF or JPEG file to your reply. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top