Tricky integral in QM variational method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the variational parameters β and μ for a given wave function in quantum mechanics, specifically for a particle in one dimension. The wave function is defined as φ(β, μ) = A sin(βx) exp(-μx²) for x ≥ 0, with the Hamiltonian incorporating a potential that is infinite for x < 0 and varies for x ≥ 0. The user expresses confusion regarding the normalization coefficient A, particularly in evaluating the integral due to the presence of x² in the exponential term. A suggestion is made to compute the integral using a technique that involves transforming it into a two-dimensional integral and applying polar coordinates. The user receives guidance on how to manipulate the integral to achieve the desired form for evaluation.
akehn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters \beta, \mu for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

\varphi(\beta,\mu)=Asin(βx)exp(-\mux^{2}) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}} for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <\varphi|\varphi>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x^{2}"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
akehn said:

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters \beta, \mu for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

\varphi(\beta,\mu)=Asin(βx)exp(-\mux^{2}) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}} for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <\varphi|\varphi>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x^{2}"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.

Hi akehn, welcome to PF! :smile:

Integrals of the form \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx can be easily computed by first calculating the square of the integral, transforming the problem from one of calculating a one-dimensional integral to one of calculating a two-dimensional integral over a region, since the 2D integral can be done easily by switching to polar coordinates

\begin{align} \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)^2 &amp;= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right) \left( \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx \right) \\ &amp;= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)\left( \int_0^\infty e^{-y^2}dy \right) \\ &amp;= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}dxdy \\ &amp;= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} e^{-r^2}r dr d\theta \end{align}

You can utilize this technique for your integral, by using Euler's formula to write \sin^2 (\beta x) in terms of complex exponentials, then "completing the square on the exponent" and making a substitution to get your integrand in the correct form.
 
Last edited:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.
 
akehn said:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.

You're welcome! Note that I made a small edit to my post to correct typos, the only one of significance being that the upper limit on the polar angle in the last integral should be \frac{\pi}{2} (90°), not \frac{\pi}{4} (45°).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top