MHB Trigonometric absolute value integral

AI Thread Summary
The limit of the integral \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \, dx evaluates to \frac{2}{\pi}. This conclusion is drawn from the periodic nature of |\sin x|, which occupies a consistent fraction of the area in any rectangle of the form [0, \pi]. As n increases, the area under |\sin(nx)| approaches this fraction in the unit square. The argument relies on partitioning the unit square into smaller rectangles that align with the sine function's periodicity. Ultimately, the area of the leftover segments diminishes to zero, confirming the limit.
jacobi1
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Evaluate [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \ dx. [/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacobi said:
Evaluate [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \ dx. [/math]

[sp]Starting from the definite integral...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{n}} \sin (n x)\ d x = \frac{2}{n}\ (1)$

... You can conclude that...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} |\sin (n x)| \ d x \sim \lfloor \frac{n}{\pi} \rfloor\ \frac{2}{n} = \frac{2}{\pi}\ (2)$

... so that the requested limit is $\frac{2}{\pi}$... [/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
[sp]Notice first that $$\int_0^\pi|\sin x|\,dx = \int_0^\pi\sin x\,dx = -\cos\pi + \cos0 = 2.$$ Thus the area under the graph of $|\sin x|$ occupies a fraction $\dfrac2\pi$ of the rectangle $[0,\pi] \times [0,1].$

Since $|\sin x|$ is periodic with period $\pi$, the same result will be true in any rectangle of the form $[x,x+\pi] \times [0,1].$

If we shrink the $x$-axis by a factor $1/n$ then the same argument shows that the area under the graph of $|\sin (nx)|$ occupies a fraction $\dfrac2\pi$ of any rectangle of the form $\bigl[x,x+\frac\pi n\bigr] \times [0,1].$

The unit square can be partitioned as the union of a number of such rectangles, together with a bit left over at the end. As $n$ increases, the area of this leftover bit will decrease to $0$. Thus when $n$ is large, the area under the graph of $|\sin (nx)|$ occupies a fraction close to $\dfrac2\pi$ of the unit square.

Therefore [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \, dx = \frac2\pi. [/math]

[That argument could be adapted so as to sound more rigorous. But in this case I think that the informal, geometric approach works best.][/sp]
 
Yes, Opalg and chisigma, you are both correct. :)
My solution is slightly different:
The function sin(nx) has many oscillations over [0,1]. For our present purpose, an 'oscillation' is defined as a 'hump' of the sine function above the x axis-where it starts from 0, increases to a maximum, and then decreases back to 0. Finding the area of one of those oscillations, multiplying that area by the number of oscillations, multiplying by two (because the number of 'humps' is the same above and below the x axis) and then taking the limit will give us the answer.
The first [math] x \neq 0[/math] where [math] \sin(nx)=0 [/math] is at [math] x= \frac{\pi}{n}[/math]. Therefore, the area of anyone of the oscillations is

[math] \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{n}} \sin(nx) \ dx = \frac{2}{n} [/math].

The number of oscillations is just the frequency- [math] f = \frac{1}{T}[/math], where T is period. The period of [math] \sin(bx) [/math] is [math] \frac{2 \pi}{b}[/math], and so the frequency of sin(nx) is [math] \frac{n}{2 \pi} [/math]. Putting it all together, we have
[math] 2 \times \frac{2}{n} \times \frac{n}{2 \pi} = \frac{2}{\pi} [/math].
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top