Troubleshooting: Imaging Agarose Gel with Ethidium Bromide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on challenges faced while running large agarose gels (1.5%, 100 V, 100 min) for PCR-RFLP analysis, particularly regarding faint DNA bands near the edges of the gel. The user notes that bands become clearer when the gel is shifted closer to the UV light source, suggesting a potential issue with the UV box's illumination rather than the ethidium bromide (EtBr) staining itself. Concerns are raised about the adequacy of EtBr concentration, as the user reuses gels and is cautious about overloading them. Suggestions include considering smaller gels for better visibility or modifying the UV light box for improved illumination. The user also mentions potential evaporation issues during PCR and restriction digestion, which may contribute to inconsistent band visibility, especially in certain wells. They seek advice on preventing evaporation while running multiple samples simultaneously.
MatthewHaas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am running agarose gels (1.5%, 100 V, 100 min) with the product of PCR-RFLP.

My gel has 96 wells...48 on top and 48 on the bottom, so it is a rather large gel...300 ml by volume.

I am having trouble getting clear, bright bands for the DNA in the lanes near the edges. It is very faint. When I shift the gel in the UV box, so the edge is closer to the center, I can see the bands very clearly.

Do I need more EtBr to see this when the gel is in the position I want to photograph? I added 15 ul initially, but reuse the gels (per instruction) and out of fear for overloading the gel, I don't add EtBr each time even though I think it is being degraded when I microwave the gel to get it into a liquid again. When I do, it is on the order of 2-3 ul.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It sounds like the lighting from your UV box isn't adequate for the size of the gels you are running.

I don't think it would be a problem with the EtBr staining itself, if when you shift the edges to center they are clearly visible. Is it possible to run smaller gels and then do your photography and give them a side by side? Or better yet, why are you using the gel size that you are?
 
I need to run 96 samples at a time, otherwise I would consider smaller.
 
I agree with bobze- it sounds like an optics problem, not a problem with the protocol. Not sure how you could easily modify the light box to increase the illumination area (alternatively, putting a central stop on the detector side and increasing the exposure time).
 
I run 96 samples on 100 ml gels. Do you really need the large gels or would you consider running smaller gels?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the responses everyone.

I run 96 samples at a time because this is a population genetics project and the number of reactions that I am performing numbers in the thousands.

I've done quite a few more gels now, and some have bands clear as day on the edges. I am beginning to think that, where the bands are faint, evaporation occurred in the plates during PCR and/or restriction digestion (even though I use a plastic sticky sheet to prevent this from happening).

Sometimes, it is specific wells that I have trouble with-"repeat offenders", so to speak. For those of you who do 96 samples at a time, how do you make certain nothing evaporates? I am pressing all the edges down, making sure there are no air bubbles trapped inside.
 
I've been reading a bunch of articles in this month's Scientific American on Alzheimer's and ran across this article in a web feed that I subscribe to. The SA articles that I've read so far have touched on issues with the blood-brain barrier but this appears to be a novel approach to the problem - fix the exit ramp and the brain clears out the plaques. https://www.sciencealert.com/new-alzheimers-treatment-clears-plaques-from-brains-of-mice-within-hours The original paper: Rapid amyloid-β...
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-deadliest-spider-in-the-world-ends-lives-in-hours-but-its-venom-may-inspire-medical-miracles-48107 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versutoxin#Mechanism_behind_Neurotoxic_Properties https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028390817301557 (subscription or purchase requred) The structure of versutoxin (δ-atracotoxin-Hv1) provides insights into the binding of site 3 neurotoxins to the voltage-gated sodium channel...

Similar threads

Back
Top