Turbulence and Turbulence Modeling

AI Thread Summary
Turbulence and its modeling are critical areas of interest, particularly in relation to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid-structure interaction. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of turbulence models, especially near flow discontinuities. Recommendations included resources like Pope's book and the Fluent Manual for understanding turbulence models such as k-epsilon and k-omega, as well as more advanced methods like LES and Unsteady RANS. The discussion also touched on the physics of turbulence and coherent structures, inviting further inquiry into their characteristics and behavior. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of robust turbulence modeling in fluid dynamics applications.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,372
Reaction score
7,225
Turbelence and modeling of this phenomenon are areas of professional interest, in addition to CFD and fluid-structure interaction.

CFD-online is an excellent reference source for topics in CFD. I came across their Wiki and thought this might be useful.

http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbulence

http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbulence_modeling

I have been concerned the turbulence models are not necessarily adequate, especially around discontinuities, e.g. obstructions in the flow field.

In addition, I am interested in developments of fluid-structure interaction models, since that requires coupling CFD with FEM structural models.

I'd be interested in any experiences or reference papers.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, Astro, for learning about "Turbulence Models", as the k-epsilon, k-omega, etc, take a look at Pope's book or to Fluent Manual. I may help you with the big picture if you have particular questions. I think these models will be more suitable for you for calculating the kind of stuff that you do in industry.

If you want to employ something more realistic but not crazy, you should use LES or Unsteady RANS. Again Pope's book offers you a wide explanation of these two methods.

Moreover, if you are interested not on rough models of turbulence like the former ones, but on the physics of turbulence and coherent structures, I really recommend you to read Pope's and classical papers on turbulence, as Brown and Roskho (Plane Shear Layer) on the JFM.

And if you want I am here for answering you some of your inquiries (the easy ones).
 
I recently got interested in this topic. Thanks for the references!

Before I dive into the literature though, I would like to know what kind of coherent structures are you talking about. Do they live in phase-space or in configuration-space? Are they self-binding? What kind of waves are they associated with?

Thanks!
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top