Two qubit state multiplication

R_physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys having a little trouble with two-qubit state multiplication.

Could you tell me how you work out the following? (not only the answers but the working out) I need to be able to understand these calculations before I can move on to the next step of an entanglement question. I understand single qubit bra and ket notation for example |0><0|. And I know |00> means the tensor product of |0> and |0> but I am struggling to compute the following:

|00><00| = ?
|00><01| = ?
|00><10| = ?
|00><11| = ?

|01><00| = ?
|01><01| = ?
|01><10| = ?
|01><11| = ?

|10><00| = ?
|10><01| = ?
|10><10| = ?
|10><11| = ?

|11><00| = ?
|11><01| = ?
|11><10| = ?
|11><11| = ?

Thanks in advance. (ps i hope i posted this in the right place, please move it if not)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by compute? I assume that you want the matrix representation in the |00>,|01>,|10>,|11>.

You have written out all 16 possible ket-bra combinations for two quibits. Each operator corresponds to a 4x4 matrix, where one entry is a one and the others are zero. You could calculate all these matrices by writing out the kets resp. bras as column resp. row vectors. If you have done this for one or two expressions, you will immediately see how the others have to look like.

For real calculations, it helps to know that every operator A can be written as A = Ʃi,j|ai><ai|A|aj><aj| = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj|. So you don't have to write any matrices, you can always stick to the bra ket notation.
 
Last edited:
Thanks you for your reply. Yes I will be doing calculations with it and I should keep it in bra and ket notation. Can you explain those equations you wrote? I think that is exactly what I have to use, but don't understand it. Thanks again for the reply
 
It's hard to answer if I don't know what exactly you don't understand.

Let's take the simple example of a single qubit. The basis elements |ai> then are simply |0> and |1>. Now how does A = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj| look like?
 
A = Ʃi,jaij|ai><aj|

To be honest from this I understand, correct me if I'm wrong:

|ai><aj| = outer product

if |ai> is |0> and |1> does <aj| represent <0| and <1| or have i completely misunderstood this?

thanks again for the reply
 
Yes that's right, so our arbitrary operator A looks like this:
A = a00|0><0| + a10|1><0| + a01|0><1| + a11|1><1|

|0> and |1> are represented by column vectors (1,0)T and (0,1)T, <0| and <1| by row vectors (1,0) and (0,1). Do you know how to calculate the outer products using this? What you get is the matrix
Code:
a[SUB]00[/SUB] a[SUB]01[/SUB]
a[SUB]10[/SUB] a[SUB]11[/SUB]
Here are a few examples and their matrix forms:
σz = |0><0| - |1><1|
Code:
1 0
0 -1
σx = |1><0| + |0><1|
Code:
0 1
1 0
σ+ = |1><0| (if you apply this operator to |0> you get |1>, hence it is the raising operator)
Code:
0 0
1 0
 
Last edited:
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Back
Top