MHB Two-tailed Test: Rejecting the Null at 0.05 Level of Significance

AI Thread Summary
In a two-tailed test with a test statistic value of 2, the probability P(T>2) is 0.03. At a 0.05 significance level, the critical value for each tail is 0.025. Since 0.03 is greater than 0.025, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The discussion highlights the common confusion in interpreting two-tailed tests and the importance of correctly applying the significance level. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate statistical analysis.
elove
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In a two-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is 2. If we know the test statistic follows a Student’s t- distribution with P
(T>2) = 0.03, then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.

I want to say True but I think I'm overthinking the problem. Can anyone help me out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is, it's a two-tailed test. If you take $0.05$ as your significance level, then you'd need $0.025$ probability in each tail. But your $P$ value is $0.03>0.025$. Therefore, you do not have sufficient statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
 
Yes! I get tripped up working backwards on problems. two-tailed - 0.05/2 = 0.025. I understand - thank you! I feel silly now on such a simple problem.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top