Unbiased Physical Vapor Deposition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user’s experience with a small vacuum Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) system that operates without bias, raising questions about its effectiveness. Despite the unbiased setup, the user reports achieving good coatings on substrates, prompting inquiries about the underlying mechanics. It is explained that in ion beam sputtering, the sputtered atoms possess sufficient kinetic energy to bond with substrate atoms, ensuring strong adhesion, especially when there is a chemical affinity. Additionally, pre-sputtering the substrate can enhance adhesion by removing impurities. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of unbiased PVD systems in achieving quality coatings.
jf11235813
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I apologize if this seems ignorant, but I am at a loss and I need some assistance. I recently built a small vacuum PVD system (Ion source, argon, target material, substrate cradle, etc.) and was showing it to a colleague when it was noticed that my system was unbiased. It actually didn't occur to me to bias the system when I was building it, but my substrate cradle is made from an insulator so it is definitely unbiased. My question is, how is it that it works?? Because it definitely works; I get a good coating on every substrate I sputter. Any help?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you are doing ion beam sputtering deposition, i. e. by aiming the ion source at the target, then the sputtered atoms reaching the substrate from the target will have an average kinetic energy that is generally more than enough (several eV) to form a bond with substrate surface atoms, but not enough energy to remove a significant amount of substrate atoms. So the coating should be pretty well adhered to the substrate, especially if there is a chemical affinity between the coating atoms and the substrate atoms. If you are using the ion beam to presputter the substrate surface before deposition, removing physically and chemically adsorbed impurity atoms, the adhesion should also be considerably removed.

Larry Stelmack lstelmack@alum.mit.edu
 
The ion source is actually pointing away from the target. Would you mind if i sent you a simple diagram to better illustrate? I'm not sure if I can explain it well enough.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top