Uncertainty of a 50g Ball's Position: What Does It Mean?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the uncertainty in the position of a 50g ball, which is calculated to be approximately 10^-32m. This small uncertainty highlights that quantum mechanics, particularly the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP), has negligible relevance for macroscopic objects. The size of macroscopic objects is significantly larger than this uncertainty, indicating that quantum effects are not significant in everyday physics. Participants express confusion about the implications of quantum mechanics on larger scales but ultimately conclude that the results from quantum mechanics are not meaningful for macroscopic entities. The conversation emphasizes the vast difference in scales between quantum phenomena and macroscopic objects.
jaidon
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
i have a question where it asks me to find the uncertainty in a ball's postion (m=50g). i have that part all figured out, but then it asks me what the answer indicates about the relevance of quantum mechanics to macroscopic objects. (the answer was approx. 10^-32m, a very small uncertainty). i am having troubles understanding this. I'm not sure what to do. i know that HUP in general says that we can't know with certainty both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time, and the equation
(delta x)(delta p) >h/4pi.

i'm not sure where to go with this. any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the typical range of macroscopic objects...?In "m".Compare that value with the uncertainty u found...

Daniel.
 
so the size of macroscopic objects is much larger than what the uncertainty in their positions. I'm not sure what this means in regards to quantum mechanics. i find quantum physics so confusing and i highly respect anyone who understands and enjoys it.
 
So QM has given u a number which is about 27 order of magnitude off the realms of macroscopical physics.The conclusion is simple:QM and the HUP in particular give nonsignificative results when applied to macroscopic objects.

Daniel.
 
this is probably a stupid question, but what exactly qualifies as macroscopic ie)what is the actual range?

also, i get the question now. it was much simpler than what i was trying to make it out to be. thanks for the imput. you physics guys rock.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top