I Understanding Admit & Adapt: Timelike Killing Vector Field

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter GR191511
  • Start date Start date
GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
"A space-time is said to be stationary if and only if it admits a timelike Killing vector field"
"...given a a timelike Killing vector field,then there always exists a coordinate system which is adapted to the Killing vector field##X^a##,that is,in which##X^a=\delta^a_0##holds..."
How to understand "admit"and"adapt"?Does it mean that ##X^a=\delta^a_0## may not hold even if there exists a timelike Killing vector field?Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Admits, in this context, is a fancy way of saying "has". Stationary spacetimes are those that have a timelike Killing vector field.

"Adapted to" means "well matched to". You can always pick a coordinate system with a timelike basis parallel to the Killing field. It's often a good idea because then your definition of space can be independent of time, and Schwarzschild coordinates are an example of this. But as always with coordinates you are free to make any choice you like. In Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates, for example, the integral curves of the Killing vector field form hyperbolas. You don't even have to have a timelike basis vector if you don't want to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark, vanhees71, Nugatory and 1 other person
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top