Understanding Buoyancy Force in Static Equilibrium: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter c.j.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Fluids
AI Thread Summary
Buoyancy force in static equilibrium arises from the pressure difference between the top and bottom surfaces of a submerged object, where the upward force equals the weight of the displaced fluid. The discussion emphasizes that in a fluid at rest, pressure increases with depth, leading to a net upward force on submerged objects. This force can be calculated by considering the weight of the fluid displaced, which is equal to the weight of the object for it to float. The conversation also touches on the relationship between the unit weight of an object and the fluid, particularly in the context of floating objects. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping buoyancy and fluid mechanics.
c.j.
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi - I'm having trouble with the bouyancy force. I understand that in static equilibrium a force from below a submerged object (not resting on the floor of a container but in the liquid) equals the overlying liquid plus the weight of the object. So that the bouyancy force is the difference of the force below minus the force above and thus equals the weight of the object. But I don't seem to have a sense as to why this equals the weight of the displaced fluid. Maybe something about the behavior of liquids?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This page describes a simple "thought experiment" that may help convince you that the buoyant force must equal the weight of the displaced fluid: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/pbuoy.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you! I'm off to class and will give a more focussed read after class. Looks like this will help!
 
I read the materials and the link is great. I tend to come from a more chemistry perspective so I think in terms of bonds, etc. So basically, the fluid's bonds, energy, etc. will allow it to "support" a certain amount of matter. If there was a tank of liquid that was in equilibrium so that all the forces in the liquid were balanced, the max the liquid could "support" would be it's own density. Anymore and it would overcome the liquid's bonds and sink and less it would not sink into the liquid. And, if the force equation is written in terms of press x area, the equations use the density and volume for mass. I guess the hydrostatic press. difference (if something goes deeper vs. a shallow submerged object) gets eliminated since the buoyancy force is the difference between the force below and the force above?
 
I may suggest you think about a submerged rectangle first then a submerged prism and then convince yourself with a general shape.

First Rule: In a fluid at rest, pressure at a point is equal to the height of the fluid body(h) * unit weight of the fluid, namely at point A, fluid pressure is equal to

p_A=\gamma h


Pressure distribution on a rectangle: (Unrealistic but helps) Think of the rectangle's top and bottom surfaces are perfectly parallel to the still fluid surface. Top surface (edge) of the rectangle is h unit-lengths below the surface. Dimensions of the rectangle is axb unit-length.

Top surface (line in this case) : Equal pressure distribution with magnitude

p=\gamma h

and the total force acting on this surface

F_{top}=\gamma h a

where a is the width of the rectangle.

Side Surfaces(Edges): Pressure forces acting on the side surface are equal and opposite. So we don't need to take them into account.

Bottom Surface(Edge): Equal pressure distribution with magnitude

p=\gamma (h+b)

and the total force acting on this surface

F_{bottom}=\gamma (h+b) a

where b is the height of the rectangle

Force Balance: For equilibrium net body and external forces must vanish.

\sum_{i}F_{i}=0

F_{bottom}-F_{top}-W=0

where W is the weight of the body. Hence

W=\gamma a b

in which a b is the total area of the rectangle. Weight of the body is equal to the weight of the fluid of the same area.

Prism: Prism will have a third dimension, say c. Then, similar to the previous discussion we can obtain the weight of the submerged prism.

W=\gamma abc

Weight of the body is equal to the fluid body of the identical volume.

The pressure difference here is in fact the buoyant force.

Now one can conclude with the well known principle :

Buoyant forces acting on a body is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the body.

This is valid for a general shape of object which don't need to submerge. I mean, it can also float.

Now, to carry this topic further, my question at this point to the audience is what is the relationship between the unit weight of the body and the fluid. What can you say about the unit weight of a floating object?
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Back
Top