A Understanding Counter Term Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory

mandy96
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Currently, I am reading about counter term renormalization used to eliminate the infinities in the loop calculations involved in QFT calculations. I found somewhere that the insertion of mass counter terms in one loop diagrams is equivalent to the derivative of one loop diagram multiplied with mass counter term. I am not getting this point.. If anybody can help me with that it would be very helpful.. Thanks..
For reference : arXiv:hep-ph/9406431 equation no. (3.6 ) in this..
Currently, I am reading about counter term renormalization used to eliminate the infinities in the loop calculations involved in QFT calculations. I found somewhere that the insertion of mass counter terms in one loop diagrams is equivalent to the derivative of one loop diagram multiplied with mass counter term. I am not getting this point.. If anybody can help me with that it would be very helpful.. Thanks..
For reference : arXiv:hep-ph/9406431 equation no. (3.6 ) in this..
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Have a look at my QFT manuscript:

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

In Chpt. 5 you find perturbative renormalization theory. The discussion of different renormalization schemes and how the derivatives wrt. mass to define the counter terms come into the game is in Sect. 5.11 about the renormalization group.
 
  • Like
Likes mandy96 and atyy
vanhees71 said:
Have a look at my QFT manuscript:

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

In Chpt. 5 you find perturbative renormalization theory. The discussion of different renormalization schemes and how the derivatives wrt. mass to define the counter terms come into the game is in Sect. 5.11 about the renormalization group.
Thanks... I will surely take a look...
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Back
Top